Violation of conservation law?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Danyon
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Conservation Law
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around a thought experiment involving a collision between two objects, "A" and "B", and the implications for conservation laws, specifically conservation of linear momentum and energy. Participants explore the complexities of the scenario, including the effects of off-center collisions and rotational motion.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant posits that if object "A" loses momentum and energy during the collision, object "B" should move downward and potentially rotate, raising questions about the conservation of energy and momentum.
  • Another participant suggests that working through the algebra, including conservation of angular momentum, will show that both momentum and energy can be conserved, despite the complexities introduced by rotation.
  • Some participants express uncertainty about how conservation laws apply in this scenario, indicating difficulty in resolving the apparent contradictions.
  • One participant mentions a desire to explore the implications of violating linear momentum for practical applications, such as designing a reactionless thruster.
  • There is a request for mathematical clarification and examples to better understand the situation, indicating a need for further exploration of the equations involved.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus, as there are competing views on whether conservation laws are violated in the described scenario. Some argue that conservation can be maintained through proper mathematical treatment, while others remain skeptical and seek further clarification.

Contextual Notes

The discussion includes unresolved mathematical steps and assumptions about the system, such as the definitions of variables and the conditions of the collision. Participants express varying levels of understanding and confidence in the application of conservation laws.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be of interest to those studying physics, particularly in the areas of mechanics, conservation laws, and rotational dynamics, as well as individuals exploring theoretical applications in engineering or spacecraft design.

Danyon
Messages
83
Reaction score
1
Consider two objects, "A" and "B", each having mass 1kg. Object "A" moves downward towards object "B" and collides with the extended arm of object "B". Let's say for the sake of argument that during this collision object "A" lost one unit of momentum and 0.5 joules to object "B" (This value does not matter because the thought experiment works for all possible values). If conservation of linear momentum applies then object "B" should then begin to move downwards with momentum 1 and energy 0.5, the movement downwards has used all the available energy (0.5 joules) However, because object "A" struck object "B" off center, object "B" should begin rotating, this should give the object an additional rotational energy, violating the law of conservation of energy. If energy is conserved in this system then the energy of the rotation must be stolen from the energy associated with the downward movement, which would violate conservation of linear momentum. Any thoughts?
 

Attachments

  • IMG_0391.JPG
    IMG_0391.JPG
    21.6 KB · Views: 442
Physics news on Phys.org
What do YOU think?
 
phinds said:
What do YOU think?
I can't find any clean ways to resolve the problem, I've been thinking about this for months, I came across this example when I was trying to design a reactionless thruster. I hope that linear momentum is violated, it would be quite useful for spacecraft
 
Work through the algebra (and don't forget to include conservation of angular momentum). You will find that the ##v^2## term in the kinetic energy interacts nicely with the ##v## term in the momentum so that both quantities end up being conserved.

(This is, BTW, a kind of fun problem, one of those problems that makes you pause for a moment and say "Hey - that really is cool!" when you see how the math works out).
 
Nugatory said:
Work through the algebra (and don't forget to include conservation of angular momentum). You will find that the ##v^2## term in the kinetic energy interacts nicely with the ##v## term in the momentum so that both quantities end up being conserved.

(This is, BTW, a kind of fun problem, one of those problems that makes you pause for a moment and say "Hey - that really is cool!" when you see how the math works out).
That's really bizarre, could you please show the math here? Just looking at the scenario its hard to imagine how something isn't violated here
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Danyon said:
That's really bizarre, could you please show the math here? Just looking at the scenario its hard to imagine how something isn't violated here
You're really going to have to work through the math for yourself - it's the only way to learn, which is why the Physics Forums rules prohibit giving complete solutions. But I'll push the rules a bit and give you the starting point.

Take the masses of the two objects to be ##m_A## and ##m_B##. Let the initial velocity of object A to be ##v_0## and the final velocity of the two objects to be ##v_A## and ##v_B## (because object B is rotating, this will be the speed of its center of mass). Let the distance from the center of mass of object B to the impact point be ##R##, the moment of inertia of object B be ##I##, and the final rotational velocity of object B be ##\omega##.

Now we have:
##m_Av_0=m_Av_A+m_Bv_B## by conservation of linear momentum
##m_Av_0^2/2=m_Av_A^2/2+m_Bv_B^2/2+I\omega^2/2## by conservation of energy
##Rm_Av_0=I\omega+Rm_Av_A## by conservation of angular momentum.

That's three equations in three unknowns (##v_A##, ##v_B##, and ##\omega##)... Solve away! I guarantee you that it is worth the effort and when you succeed you'll be glad you did.

For now, this thread is closed. If you need more help from here, you should start a thread in the homework forum where the helpers can work you through the hard spots.

[The thread is closed, but I have been known to mistype formulas from time to time. Everyone watching, PM me if this is one of those times].
[EDIT - yep, I got the post collision angular momentum wrong the first time around. I just edited this post to fix it]
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: berkeman and nanta771

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 53 ·
2
Replies
53
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K