Viscosity, two immicible phase flow, wettabilility

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Jabbar_B
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Flow Phase Viscosity
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the flow dynamics of immiscible fluids, specifically the interaction between a wetting phase (water) and a non-wetting phase (oil) on an inclined surface. It is established that the velocity of the non-wetting phase is influenced by viscosity, but not solely dependent on it when flowing over the wetting phase. Key references include Scriven's 1960 work on jump momentum balance conditions and the book "Transport Phenomena" by Bird, Stewart, and Lightfoot, which addresses the behavior of two fluids with different viscosities in flow channels.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of fluid dynamics principles
  • Familiarity with immiscible fluid behavior
  • Knowledge of viscosity and its effects on flow
  • Basic grasp of momentum balance equations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study Scriven's 1960 paper on jump momentum balance conditions
  • Explore "Transport Phenomena" by Bird, Stewart, and Lightfoot for in-depth fluid interaction analysis
  • Research the Boussinesq surface fluid model for distinct interface properties
  • Investigate the application of the Laplace equation ΔP=2σκ in fluid dynamics
USEFUL FOR

Fluid dynamicists, chemical engineers, and researchers studying immiscible fluid interactions and flow behavior in various applications.

Jabbar_B
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
If the single phase flows on the inclined surface and this phase (let's say water) is wetting the surface then closest layer to the surface will be bounded and will not move. And velocity of flow will be in inverse proportion with viscosity of the fluid.
If now the second phase is introduced, immicible and non-wetting phase (lets say oil), it flow on top of the wetting phase. So non-wetting phase will flow on top of the thin film of wetting phase which is bounded to the surface. So now, would velocity of the non-wetting phase be dependent on the Viscosity similarly as in single wetting phase case?
thanks in advance,
J
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes. It would be dependent on the viscosity.
 
non-wetting fluid (oil) flows on top of the wetting fluid (water film on top of the surface). And because these two fluids do not mix that mean oil is "ice skate" on top of the water. In that case velocity will not merely depend on viscosity unlike the case when oil is wetting the surface and outer most layer is attached to surface.

is there any study on friction between immiscible fluids in flow condition?

Thanks for reply
J
 
Jabbar_B said:
non-wetting fluid (oil) flows on top of the wetting fluid (water film on top of the surface). And because these two fluids do not mix that mean oil is "ice skate" on top of the water. In that case velocity will not merely depend on viscosity unlike the case when oil is wetting the surface and outer most layer is attached to surface.

is there any study on friction between immiscible fluids in flow condition?

Thanks for reply
J

There are entire books on the subject. You are asking for the jump momentum balance condition across the deformable boundary, first written out by Scriven in 1960:

http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0009250960870030
 
Bird, Stewart, and Lightfoot, Transport Phenomena, solve the problem of two fluids in contact with one another of different viscosities flowing through a flow channel. Across the interface, the shear stress and normal stress are continuous.
 
Chestermiller said:
Bird, Stewart, and Lightfoot, Transport Phenomena, solve the problem of two fluids in contact with one another of different viscosities flowing through a flow channel. Across the interface, the shear stress and normal stress are continuous.

They don't have to be continuous- the interface may be separately modeled (Boussinesq surface fluid) with properties distinct from bulk phases. Similarly, the Laplace equation ΔP=2σκ is a jump condition across a deformed interface.
 
Andy Resnick said:
They don't have to be continuous- the interface may be separately modeled (Boussinesq surface fluid) with properties distinct from bulk phases. Similarly, the Laplace equation ΔP=2σκ is a jump condition across a deformed interface.
Good point. Thanks.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 49 ·
2
Replies
49
Views
5K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K