Voltage across a load resistor in a Voltage Divider Circuit

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
6 replies · 4K views
Martinet
Messages
28
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Show that V across Resistor Rkohms is: (11R) / (3.96 + 4R) V

The circuit is a 5V cell in series with a 1.8k resistor. Following the 1.8k resistor are a 2.2k and Rk resistor in parallel with each other. The wires then rejoin and return to the cell.Current through the circuit has already been found as 5(2.2 + R) / (3.96 + 4R) mA

Homework Equations



I = V/R

The Attempt at a Solution



I = 5(2.2 + R) / (3.96 + 4R)
thus I through R
= 5(2.2 + R) / (3.96 + 4R) * (R / 2.2 + R) <= Current is divided proportionally to the strength of the resistor.
= 5R / (3.96 + 4R) <= Simplification.

V = IR
thus V across R
= (5R / 3.96 + 4R)) * R <= Voltage is equal to the divided current * the resistance, R.
= 5R^2 / (3.96 + 4R) <= Simplification.

I'm not quite sure where I'm going wrong. I have a funny feeling it might have something to do with voltage divider theory but I can't see how that would be incorporated. ANy help would be much appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi Martinet! http://img96.imageshack.us/img96/5725/red5e5etimes5e5e45e5e25.gif
Martinet said:
The circuit is a 5V cell in series with a 1.8k resistor. Following the 1.8k resistor are a 2.2k and Rk resistor in parallel with each other. The wires then rejoin and return to the cell.

Current through the circuit has already been found as 5(2.2 + R) / (3.96 + 4R) mA
Correct.
thus I through R
= 5(2.2 + R) / (3.96 + 4R) * (R / 2.2 + R)
Wrong. And it's still wrong even when you add the essential brackets. :frown:

https://www.physicsforums.com/images/icons/icon2.gif Current in R = 5(2.2 + R) / (3.96 + 4R) * (2.2[/color] /( 2.2 + R)) mA
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Hey Nascent. Can you explain to me why the current is relative to the 2.2k as opposed to the resistor across which voltage is being measured?
 
The greater the parallel resistor, the greater the share through R. Current share is in inverse proportion to the resistances.

If the parallel resistor were zero ohms (a short circuit), then zero current would go through R (it would all be going through the short circuit).
 
Martinet said:
Hey Nascent. Can you explain to me why the current is relative to the 2.2k as opposed to the resistor across which voltage is being measured?
With the pair being in parallel, measuring the voltage across one is the same as measuring the voltage across the other. :smile:
 
Okay. Now I understand. Vaguely, but I think I understand. Thanks very much. I think I need to refine my basic understanding of electricity itself. I'm still in that rut where I imagine electrons coming out of a battery instead of merely being pushed/dragged along by it.
 
It's easy enough to work out from first principles. Imagine two resistors in parallel, R and 2.2Ω, with a voltage V applied across each. The current through the 2.2Ω is V/2.2, the current through R is V/R.

The sum of the currents = ...
The fraction of total current that goes through R = (V/R) / ( ... )

Reduce this expression to a simple fraction.

Commit the result to memory. :smile: