Voltage across current-controlled-current-source

  • Thread starter Thread starter kexanie
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Voltage
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around analyzing a circuit with a current-controlled current source, focusing on finding the Thevenin and Norton equivalent circuits. The circuit includes impedances and a dependent source, with specific values provided for the components.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the implications of having an open circuit and the necessity of a load for proper analysis. Questions arise regarding the behavior of the dependent source and the relationship between the currents in the circuit.

Discussion Status

Some participants have offered insights into the implications of leaving the terminals open and the resulting contradictions. There is a recognition of the need to consider the current values and the behavior of the dependent source in this scenario.

Contextual Notes

There is mention of specific circuit constraints, such as the requirement for a load to be present and the instructor's comments regarding the deactivation of the dependent source when terminals are left open.

kexanie
Messages
11
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Draw the Thevenin and Norton equivalent circuits for diagram 1, labeling the elements and terminals.
ZR = 5 Ω, ZL = j5Ω, Vs = 3∠30°, the current flowing through the resistance is Ix, and the current flowing through the dependent current source is 0.5Ix.

Homework Equations



KVL and KCL in Steady-State Sinusoidal Analysis.
Ohm's law in Steady-State Sinusoidal Analysis.

The Attempt at a Solution



Because this circuit contains a dependent source, I cannot find the Thevenin resistance by zeroing the sources and combining the impedances in series. Thus, I try to find the open-circuit voltage.

But what I don't understand is, by using KVL, Vs = VL + VId + VR. How can I derived the voltage across the dependent current source?
 

Attachments

  • Diagram1.png
    Diagram1.png
    3.2 KB · Views: 624
Physics news on Phys.org
You should be able to see that this circuit must have some kind of load attached at a-b or else it will not be a correct circuit. Can you spot the contradiction that would arise if the terminals are left open?

Once you've satisfied yourself that this is the case, decide what kind of "load" you want to place on the circuit to facilitate analysis.

EDIT: Actually, it occurs to me that there is a valid solution obtainable for the open circuit voltage provided that a particular current value and voltage across the current source occurs. The value for the current can be arrived at by considering the "contradiction" I mentioned above and thinking through the implications.
 
gneill said:
You should be able to see that this circuit must have some kind of load attached at a-b or else it will not be a correct circuit. Can you spot the contradiction that would arise if the terminals are left open?

Once you've satisfied yourself that this is the case, decide what kind of "load" you want to place on the circuit to facilitate analysis.

EDIT: Actually, it occurs to me that there is a valid solution obtainable for the open circuit voltage provided that a particular current value and voltage across the current source occurs. The value for the current can be arrived at by considering the "contradiction" I mentioned above and thinking through the implications.

If the teriminals are left open, the current flowing through the resistor is Ix, and for the dependent source it is 0.5Ix. However, since they are in series, the current should be the same.

Hence Ix = 0 ? There is no current flowing through the loop? And the voltage between terminal a and b is just Vs?

Actually my instructor told me that the dependent current source will be "deactivated" in this case but I did not get it.
 
kexanie said:
If the teriminals are left open, the current flowing through the resistor is Ix, and for the dependent source it is 0.5Ix. However, since they are in series, the current should be the same.

Hence Ix = 0 ? There is no current flowing through the loop? And the voltage between terminal a and b is just Vs?
Yes, that is correct and well constructed logic.

Actually my instructor told me that the dependent current source will be "deactivated" in this case but I did not get it.
And now you do :smile:
 

Similar threads

Replies
9
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K