Voltage/Current phase diff and more

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter martix
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Phase
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the phase difference between voltage and current in electrical circuits, specifically how voltage can lead or lag current. It highlights the concepts of impedance, real and imaginary resistance, and the physical significance of reactance in capacitive and inductive components. A capacitor's current peaks 90 degrees before its voltage, while an inductor's voltage peaks 90 degrees before its current. Additionally, it clarifies that power in capacitors and inductors is imaginary, indicating energy absorption and release rather than dissipation.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of AC circuit theory
  • Familiarity with impedance and reactance concepts
  • Knowledge of capacitors and inductors in electrical circuits
  • Basic grasp of Euler's formula and complex numbers
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the mathematical representation of impedance in AC circuits
  • Learn about the physical significance of reactance in capacitive and inductive components
  • Explore the implications of imaginary power in AC circuits
  • Investigate the role of phase difference in power factor correction techniques
USEFUL FOR

Electrical engineers, physics students, and anyone interested in understanding the dynamics of AC circuits, particularly the behavior of capacitors and inductors in relation to voltage and current phase differences.

martix
Messages
167
Reaction score
5
Voltage/Current phase difference and more...

Can someone please explain in physical terms what it means that the phase of the voltage lags/leads the current ...among other things...
Like:
1. Impedance - what's the difference between the real and the imag resistance and what's the physical significance of both.
2. The whole reactance idea(general and capacitive/inductive).
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org


martix said:
Can someone please explain in physical terms what it means that the phase of the voltage lags/leads the current ...among other things...
Like:
1. Impedance - what's the difference between the real and the imag resistance and what's the physical significance of both.
2. The whole reactance idea(general and capacitive/inductive).
A phase difference between voltage and current simply means that points of maximum voltage do not occur at the same time as maximum current.

For a pure capacitor the greatest current occurs when the applied voltage begins to increase from 0 as there is not yet any charge on the capacitor. As the applied voltage increases the charge on the capacitor increases due to the current flow. At the same time, the capacitive reactance (ie. the voltage caused by the charge build up in the capacitor) increases and opposes the applied voltage, thereby limiting current. When the applied voltage is maximum, the applied voltage is the same as the opposing voltage from the build up of charge on the capacitor, so the current is zero. The applied voltage starts to decrease and the charge on the capacitor starts flowing out of the capacitor. The discharge current is maximum when the applied voltage is 0.

So you can see from that qualitative description of a capacitor that current is out of step with voltage. If you plot the sine curve for current and voltage, the current peak will occur 90 degrees (or 1/4 of a cycle) before the voltage peak.

The opposite occurs for an inductor. For an inductor, the voltage peak occurs 90 degrees before current peaks.

AM
 
Last edited:


martix said:
Can someone please explain in physical terms what it means that the phase of the voltage lags/leads the current ...among other things...
Like:
1. Impedance - what's the difference between the real and the imag resistance and what's the physical significance of both.
2. The whole reactance idea(general and capacitive/inductive).

And here's a thread from the EE forum where we discussed this also:

https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=174615

.
 


berkeman said:
And here's a thread from the EE forum where we discussed this also:

https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=174615

.
This is a useful thread. But with respect to this comment:

what said:
Also note that power dissipated by an inductor or a capacitor is imaginary. That means instead of dissipating power as heat like a resistor, capacitor or an inductor is absorbing power (because of lead or lag).
The terminology might be misleading. In a circuit with a pure inductor or capacitor (R=0) to which an alternating voltage is applied, power is not dissipated. The energy consumed over any number of complete cycles is zero. That is:

\int_{0}^{nT} \vec{V}\cdot\vec{I}dt = 0

This, of course, ignores loss due to electromagnetic waves, which becomes significant at high frequencies.

A capacitor or inductor does not just absorb energy, it also releases energy. It is the periodic absorption and release of energy that results in no net dissipation of energy.

AM
 
A great explanation from Andrew Mason. Its amazing how the right formulation can put things into perspective. Had a little trouble figuring what happens to an inductor though. As someone mentioned in the other thread - "Most expositions explain the capacitive case but gloss over the inductive one."
As for the real/imag part - I found out about Euler's formula in the mean time. Amazing thing really. :)
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
5K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 61 ·
3
Replies
61
Views
5K