Voltage on a electrostatic charged sphere

AI Thread Summary
Voltage on an electrostatically charged sphere is determined by the formula q*k/r, where q is charge, k is a constant, and r is the radius. When a metal box contacts a charged sphere at 100 kV, the voltage relative to the box depends on its position and grounding. If the box is grounded, it will not maintain the same voltage as the sphere. Applying voltage from a battery to a metallic object can induce a small static charge, but this charge will be minimal. Understanding the relationship between charge, voltage, and grounding is crucial in these scenarios.
abdo799
Messages
168
Reaction score
4
I understand that voltage depends on how far the electrons are, so for a sphere it would be q*k / r.
But what if a sphere with 100kv , then we put with contact to it a metal box , becoming on body, will the volt remain 100kv
 
Physics news on Phys.org
100kV relative to what?
What is the position of the box relative to the sphere?

I guess no, but for me it is not clear what you want to measure.
 
Hello people... Charged body has an voltage.. But the reverse...can applying voltage to a metallic object from a battery who's other terminal is grounded produce static charge on that metallic object??
 
Yes (but the charge will be tiny with batteries).

Please start a new thread for your own questions.
 
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
Back
Top