Volume for a cone in cylindrical coordinates.

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
2 replies · 4K views
Telemachus
Messages
820
Reaction score
30

Homework Statement


Hi there. I haven't used iterated integrals for a while, and I'm studying some mechanics, the inertia tensor, etc. so I need to use some calculus. And I'm having some trouble with it.

I was trying to find the volume of a cone, and then I've found lots of trouble with such a simple problem.

So I thought of using cylindrical coordinates this way:
[tex]\begin{Bmatrix}{ x=r\cos\theta} \\y=r\sin\theta \\z=r\end{matrix}[/tex]

And then I've stated the integral this way:

[tex]\displaystyle\int_{0}^{2\pi}\displaystyle\int_{0}^{r}\displaystyle\int_{r}^{h}rdzdrd\theta=\displaystyle\int_{0}^{2\pi}\displaystyle\int_{0}^{r}r(h-r)drd\theta=\displaystyle\int_{0}^{2\pi}\displaystyle\frac{r^2h}{2}-\displaystyle\frac{r^3}{3}=\pi r^2h-\displaystyle\frac{2\pi\r^3}{3}=\pi r^2(h-\displaystyle\frac{2}{3}r)[/tex]

But I should get: [tex]V_{cone}=\displaystyle\frac{\pi r^2 h}{3}[/tex]

I think I'm giving wrong limits for the integration.

Help pls :)
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi Telemachus! :smile:
Telemachus said:
I think I'm giving wrong limits for the integration.

No, your integration is fine. :smile:

(I'd have used spherical coordinates, but your way does work)

But you're doing it for the 45° cone instead of a general cone (so r = h, which makes your formula the same as the given answer).

Somehow your variable of integration r has managed to survive into the afterlife under a new persona. :wink:
 
Thanks Tim :)

Haha sorry for the notation, I should used another name for the variable :P