Volume of a Non-Coplanar Hexahedron

  • Thread starter Thread starter Spectre5
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Volume
AI Thread Summary
Calculating the volume of a non-coplanar hexahedron can be challenging, especially when two opposite faces are not coplanar. Initially, the method using the Jacobian and shape functions was incorrectly applied by evaluating at the center of the parametric element. The correct approach involves integrating the Jacobian properly for 3D elements. This adjustment allows for accurate volume computation even with non-coplanar faces. The solution confirms that the Jacobian method is still applicable in this scenario.
Spectre5
Messages
182
Reaction score
0
Hello,

I'm trying to calculate the volume of a hexahedron. I know how to do this for any arbitrary hexahedron as long as the 4 points of each face are coplanar (by using shape functions to calculate the Jacobian in a parametric space or using 5 tetrahedrons). However, the catch is that two of the faces are not coplanar. Two of the faces opposite of each other are not coplanar while the 4 surrounding sides are. If it is MUCH easier to do this computation with only one side non-coplanar, then I'd still be interested in that as well.

I know the location of all 8 vertices, but I can't figure out how to get the area of the non-coplanar hexahedron.

The non-coplanar surfaces would be doubly ruled surfaces as the one shown below:
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/0/01/Hyperbolic-paraboloid.svg"


Thanks,
Scott
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
hm...I've found the solution. For anyone that stumbles upon this in the future...

The Jacobian DOES work, even for those non-coplanar faces. My mistake was that I was integrating the Jacobian evaluated at the center of the parametric element. For a 2D element using the shape functions I use, this works. But for a 3D element, this does not work. I now get the correct answer.

-Scott
 
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
38
Views
15K
Replies
0
Views
3K
Replies
23
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
10K
Replies
6
Views
6K
Back
Top