Volume of a Pond (Triple Integral)

[Woolyabyss]

Homework Statement

A circular pond with radius 1 metre and a maximum depth of 1 metre has the shape of a paraboloid, so that its depth z is z = x 2 + y 2 − 1. What is the total volume of the pond? How does this compare with the case where the pond has the same radius but has the shape of a hemisphere?

Homework Equations

n/a

The Attempt at a Solution

\int _{-1}^0\left(\int _{-\sqrt{1-x^2}}^{\sqrt{1-x^2}}\left(\int _{x^2+y^2-1}^0\left(\right)dz\right)dy\right)dx

I was just wondering if this triple integral accurately describes what the question is asking? I searched online but can't find any anything similar.

 

[BvU]

Homework Statement

A circular pond with radius 1 metre and a maximum depth of 1 metre has the shape of a paraboloid, so that its depth z is z = x 2 + y 2 − 1. What is the total volume of the pond? How does this compare with the case where the pond has the same radius but has the shape of a hemisphere?

Homework Equations

n/a

The Attempt at a Solution

$$\int _{-1}^0\left(\int _{-\sqrt{1-x^2}}^{\sqrt{1-x^2}}\left(\int _{x^2+y^2-1}^0\left(\right)dz\right)dy\right)dx$$

I was just wondering if this triple integral accurately describes what the question is asking? I searched online but can't find any anything similar.

Now (with the $\$\$$ around the $\TeX$) it looks OK. You can see the bounds sitting there properly.

 

[blue_leaf77]

I was just wondering if this triple integral accurately describes what the question is asking? I searched online but can't find any anything similar.

Doesn't seem to work. If you want to integrate in Cartesian variables, you should identify the correct limits for each variable. I suggest that you work in cylindrical coordinate instead, because in this case there is only one variable whose integration limits are a function of the other two variables.

 

[Woolyabyss]

Doesn't seem to work. If you want to integrate in Cartesian variables, you should identify the correct limits for each variable. I suggest that you work in cylindrical coordinate instead, because in this case there is only one variable whose integration limits are a function of the other two variables.

So in cylindrical coordinates if we integrate in the order z,r,θ
would the limits be r-1 to 0,-r to r and 0 to 2*pi?

EDIT
or should it be r-1 to 0,0 to r and 0 to 2*pi?

 

[BvU]

Neither. z is not r-1 to 0 (that would be a cone)

(PS post #2 only said something about the look of things..., not the solubility)

 

[Woolyabyss]

Neither. z is not r-1 to 0 (that would be a cone)

(PS post #2 only said something about the look of things..., not the solubility)

is it r^2 -1 to 0 ,0 to r and 0 to 2*pi?

 

[blue_leaf77]

For your purpose, it will be helpful to think of the pond as being made of a stack of infinitesimally thick disks put on top of another in z direction such that they form a paraboloidal volume. Now consider a disk located at a fixed plane $z$. The thickness of this disk is $dz$. For the area of this disk, how will you calculate it using the integral in polar coordinate $r$, $\theta$? To do this, first you need to express the radius of this disk as a function of $z$.

 

[Woolyabyss]

Thanks guys,
I realized in my original integral x should have been from -1 to 1 and not 0 to 1. also in polar coordinates if I use is it r^2 -1 to 0 ,0 to 1 and 0 to 2*pi, I get the same answer of (1/2)*pi