Volume of solid bounded by paraboloid and plane.

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around finding the volume of a solid bounded by a paraboloid defined by the equation 4z = x^2 + y^2 and the plane z = 4. Participants are exploring how to set up the integral for this volume calculation and the decision-making process regarding the use of double versus triple integrals.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss setting up the integral and the choice between double and triple integrals for volume calculation. There is mention of using polar coordinates and the challenges faced in evaluating integrals using different methods.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided guidance on setting up the integral using polar coordinates, while others express uncertainty about the correct function to integrate over. There is an ongoing exploration of different methods and approaches without a clear consensus on the best path forward.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that they have not covered cylindrical coordinates yet, which influences their approach to the problem. There is also a mention of the intersection of the paraboloid and the plane, which is relevant for determining the limits of integration.

philnow
Messages
83
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Hi. I'm asked to find the volume of the solid bounded by the paraboloid

4z=x^2 + y^2 and the plane z=4

I have drawn the graph in 3D but I'm unsure of how to set up the integral. Also, how does one decide to use double integrals/triple integrals when finding volume?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
philnow said:

Homework Statement



Hi. I'm asked to find the volume of the solid bounded by the paraboloid

4z=x^2 + y^2 and the plane z=4

I have drawn the graph in 3D but I'm unsure of how to set up the integral. Also, how does one decide to use double integrals/triple integrals when finding volume?
You could use both! But since V= \int\int\int dV= \int\int\int dzdydx but since the integral of "dz" is just z, if the boundaries can be written as z= f(x,y) and z= g(x,y), then that triple integral just reduces to the double integral \int\int\int (f(x,y)- g(x,y))dydx

Here the upper boundary is just z= 4 and the lower boundary is z= (1/4)(x^2+ y^2), You could integrate
\int\int\int_{z= (1/4)(x^2+y^2)}^4 dzdydx[/itex]<br /> or just write it as the double integral \int\int ((1/4)(x^2+y^2)- 4)dydx.<br /> <br /> Now, the limits of integration in x and y: When you graphed it you probably saw that the paraboloid and plane intersect where z= 4 and 4(4)= 16= x^2+ y^2 which, projected to the xy-plane is the circle x^2+ y^2= 16 and the entire figure is inside that cylinder. So the limits of integration for x and y are given by that circle. One way to cover that circle is to take x from -4 to 4 and, for each x, y from<br /> -\sqrt{16- x^2}<br /> to <br /> \sqrt{16- x^2}<br /> Or, because of symmetry, y from -4 to 4 and, for each y, x from <br /> -\sqrt{16- y^2}<br /> to <br /> \sqrt{16- y^2}.<br /> <br /> Perhaps simplest, because of the circular symmetry, is to use polar coordinates with r going from 0 to 4 and \theta from 0 to 2\pi. That would be the same as setting up the entire in cylindrical coordinates: the boundaries would have equations z= 4 and 4z= r^2 in cylindrical coordinates.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Thanks for the reply. If I wanted to set it up using polar coordinates (I haven't covered cylindrical coordinates yet) I would take r between 0 and 4, theta between 0 and 2pi, but over what function would I integrate?
 
I can't seem to evaluate the integral using the "dydx" method, so I'm thinking this problem needs to be done using polar coordinates.
 
philnow said:
Thanks for the reply. If I wanted to set it up using polar coordinates (I haven't covered cylindrical coordinates yet) I would take r between 0 and 4, theta between 0 and 2pi, but over what function would I integrate?
I believe I answered that in the second paragraph of my response.
 
philnow said:
I can't seem to evaluate the integral using the "dydx" method, so I'm thinking this problem needs to be done using polar coordinates.
Sure you can.
\int_{x=-1}^1\int{y= -\sqrt{16-x^2}}^\sqrt{16-x^2} (4- (1/4)(x^2+ y^2)dydx[/itex]<br /> <br /> The first integral will give, of course, 4y- (1/4)(x^2y+ (1/3)y^3) evaluated between <br /> -\sqrt{16- x^2} and \sqrt{16-x^2} or 8\sqrt{1-x^2}+ 2(x^2\sqrt{1- x^2}+ (1/3)(1- x^2)^{3/2} and that looks like a candidate for a trig substitution like x= sin(t).<br /> <br /> But yes, it will be much simpler in polar coordinates.
 
Well, I'm not sure what part of your post corresponds to the second paragraph >.<

So does this integral look correct?

Double integral from 0 to 4 and from 0 to 2pi

(4-(x^2+y^2)/4)*r d(theta)dr = (4 - r/4)*r d(theta)dr
 
Could I get a confirmation that this is indeed correct?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
2K