Warning for citing book and paper by Einstein

  • Thread starter Thread starter harrylin
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
A user received a warning for linking to Einstein's 1916 book on relativity and his foundational paper on general relativity, which was later reversed as a mistake. The warning cited a rule against using non-peer-reviewed sources, leading to confusion about moderation practices. Participants clarified that warnings carry no points and that users should contact mentors directly for moderation questions rather than starting public threads. It was emphasized that while there is no formal appeal process, users can discuss their concerns with mentors, provided they remain respectful. Overall, the discussion highlighted the importance of understanding moderation rules and the discretion of mentors in enforcing them.
harrylin
Messages
3,874
Reaction score
93
To my great astonishment I just received a warning for providing links to a book and a peer-reviewed paper by Einstein, one put online by Bartelby.com and the other by Wikisource.org.

The first is a link to his 1916 book explaining Relativity in easy to understand language, while the second is a link to the text of his foundational paper on GRT, also of 1916.
Usually I provide a link to a pdf version of the paper, but it's a very sizable download; a text version appeared therefore more appropriate to me.

The warning was:

"General Warning
Unless you have a valid, peer-reviewed source, please do not cite something off a webpage."

Can anyone here explain to me why I should get an official warning for providing links to such quality papers? I'm flabbergasted.

Harald
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You don't have any infractions or warnings. A warning was given and almost immediately reversed because it was a mistake, If you look at your infracations, you'll see zero.

The rules state that if you have a question about moderation, you should contact the mentor involved via PM. You should not start a thread about it unless you have exhausted appeals.
 
Evo said:
You don't have any infractions or warnings. A warning was given and almost immediately reversed because it was a mistake, If you look at your infracations, you'll see zero.

The rules state that if you have a question about moderation, you should contact the mentor involved via PM. You should not start a thread about it unless you have exhausted appeals.

Thank you - in fact I also did that. And now indeed I see the little note "reversed" - thanks for clarifying that. :smile:

I also found the explanation that anyway warnings carry zero points. But where is anything written about "appeals"? I'm afraid that I still don't fully understand how moderation here works...
 
There's no such thing as an appeal. You can discuss why you receive it and complain to others if you feel it's unjust.

Do as the mentors say and understand they have full discretion on moderation. The rules outline what issues are moderated.

Pretty much it.
 
I do think that you can do a form of appeal. Send a mail to the mentors and explain why it's unjust. Sometimes the infraction will be lifted...
 
micromass said:
I do think that you can do a form of appeal. Send a mail to the mentors and explain why it's unjust. Sometimes the infraction will be lifted...

But only if you're polite to said mentor. Calling them "defenders of the orthodoxy" isn't a good idea.
 
I want to thank those members who interacted with me a couple of years ago in two Optics Forum threads. They were @Drakkith, @hutchphd, @Gleb1964, and @KAHR-Alpha. I had something I wanted the scientific community to know and slipped a new idea in against the rules. Thank you also to @berkeman for suggesting paths to meet with academia. Anyway, I finally got a paper on the same matter as discussed in those forum threads, the fat lens model, got it peer-reviewed, and IJRAP...
About 20 years ago, in my mid-30s (and with a BA in economics and a master's in business), I started taking night classes in physics hoping to eventually earn the science degree I'd always wanted but never pursued. I found physics forums and used it to ask questions I was unable to get answered from my textbooks or class lectures. Unfortunately, work and life got in the way and I never got further the freshman courses. Well, here it is 20 years later. I'm in my mid-50s now, and in a...
Back
Top