Was the Spitfire Area-Ruled?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Alan1000
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The Supermarine Spitfire, known for its impressive performance during World War II, may have unintentionally incorporated an area-ruled fuselage design, which could have contributed to its high Mach rating among propeller-driven fighters. Observations indicate a tapering of the fuselage cross-section behind the engine, aligning with the wing's leading edge, which might have helped delay compressibility effects. Although the area rule concept was not established until later, it is suggested that designer R.J. Mitchell may have instinctively optimized the fuselage shape to enhance wing lift. Historical accounts, such as those in Pierre Clostermann's "The Big Show," highlight the Spitfire's capabilities in extreme conditions, including high-speed dives. This discussion raises intriguing questions about the aerodynamic features of the Spitfire and their impact on its performance.
Alan1000
Messages
25
Reaction score
0
Was the Spitfire "area-ruled"?

Any aerodynamicists out there?

The Supermarine Spitfire, designed in the mid-1930s, supposedly enjoyed the highest mach rating of any propellor-driven fighter in World War 2. Even the Mustang, with its state-of-the-art laminar flow wing, could not match the Spitfire in the dive.

While looking at a photo of a Spitfire recently, it occurred to me that it had a somewhat area-ruled fuselage. If you look at a picture taken from slightly above, you can see that immediately behind the engine cylinder banks, roughly in line with the wing leading edge, there is a substantial tapering-off of fuselage cross-sectional area. This continues for some distance, then, behind the point of maximum chord thickness, the cockpit canopy causes cross sectional area to increase once more.

This "area-ruling" was presumably not designed as such, because the concept hadn't been thought of then (as far as I know). But how significant was it, I wonder, in delaying the onset of compressibility effects?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
The Area Rule was first noticed by Otto Frenzl at Junkers in 1943.
In 1951 in the USA it become the Whitcomb Area Rule.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Area_rule#History

I suspect Mitchell intuitively reduced the fuselage section at the wing so as to improve and not interfere with the lift of the wing.

In the book “The Big Show” by Pierre Clostermann, there is a report of two Strato-Spitfires, with pressurised cockpit canopies bolted down, in a vertical dive from 43,000 feet in pursuit of a photo-reconnaissance Messerschmitt Bf 109G.

“The Hun made full use of his GM-1 booster [Nitro injection] and kept his lead. At 27,000 feet my A.S. indicator showed 440 mph, i.e. a true speed of 600 mph. I had both hands on the stick and I leant on the controls with all my strength to keep the aircraft in a straight line. The slightest swerve would have crumpled up the wings. I felt my Spitfire jumping all the same, and I could see the paint cracking on the wings, while the engine was beginning to race.”
 
Thread 'Physics of Stretch: What pressure does a band apply on a cylinder?'
Scenario 1 (figure 1) A continuous loop of elastic material is stretched around two metal bars. The top bar is attached to a load cell that reads force. The lower bar can be moved downwards to stretch the elastic material. The lower bar is moved downwards until the two bars are 1190mm apart, stretching the elastic material. The bars are 5mm thick, so the total internal loop length is 1200mm (1190mm + 5mm + 5mm). At this level of stretch, the load cell reads 45N tensile force. Key numbers...
I'm trying to decide what size and type of galvanized steel I need for 2 cantilever extensions. The cantilever is 5 ft. The space between the two cantilever arms is a 17 ft Gap the center 7 ft of the 17 ft Gap we'll need to Bear approximately 17,000 lb spread evenly from the front of the cantilever to the back of the cantilever over 5 ft. I will put support beams across these cantilever arms to support the load evenly

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
8K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
8K
Back
Top