Water electrolysis - solving for final volume of the system

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the electrolysis of water in a closed container, specifically focusing on calculating the final volume of the system after electrolysis, given certain parameters such as current, voltage, and initial conditions. The conversation includes aspects of thermodynamics, gas laws, and the behavior of liquids and gases under changing conditions.

Discussion Character

  • Homework-related
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant calculates the mass of hydrogen and oxygen produced during electrolysis and attempts to determine the final volume using Charles's law.
  • Another participant suggests that the volume of gaseous products is determined by the quantity of water and notes that the initial volume of water is about 3.96 mL, which will increase slightly due to the conversion of liquid to gas.
  • Some participants discuss the effects of temperature and pressure on the system, with one noting that the electrical energy heats the contents of the container, causing expansion.
  • There is confusion regarding the initial volume of gas in the container, with questions about how it relates to the initial liquid volume of 36 mL.
  • One participant asserts that no gas law is needed and that the volume increase is directly related to the mass of water converted, while another participant emphasizes the need for clarity in the problem statement.
  • Several participants express uncertainty about the correct approach to solving for final volume and pressure, with discussions about the implications of a closed container at standard pressure.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the interpretation of the problem, particularly regarding the initial conditions and the implications of a closed container under electrolysis. There is no consensus on the correct method to calculate the final volume and pressure, and multiple competing views remain on how to approach the problem.

Contextual Notes

Participants note limitations in the problem statement, including ambiguity regarding the definitions of pressure and volume in a closed system during electrolysis. There are unresolved questions about the assumptions made regarding the behavior of gases and liquids under the given conditions.

HelloCthulhu
Messages
150
Reaction score
3

Homework Statement


2 moles of water at 20°C undergoes electrolysis at 5A/40V inside of a closed 40mL container for 1 min at standard external/internal pressure. What is the final volume of the system?

Homework Equations



(Q*M)/(F*z)=m

Q=c x m x ΔT

Vi/Ti = Vf/Tf

The Attempt at a Solution



Gas Produced
(5A*60s*4g)/(F*4)=0.00311g H2
(5A*60s*32g)/(F*4)=0.024875g O2
0.00311g + 0.024875g = 0.02798g

Temperature of the system
Q=cmΔT
5A*40V*60s=12kJ
Liquid 36g x 4.18J/(g⋅K)=150.48J/(g⋅K)
Gas 0.02798g x 2.080J/(g⋅K)=0.0582J/(g⋅K)
150.48J/(g⋅K) + 0.0582J/(g⋅K)=150.538J/(g⋅K)
12kJ=150.538J/(g⋅K)/(g⋅K)*ΔT
12kJ/150.538J/(g⋅K)=(T2-20°C)
79.7 + 20°C=99.7°C

Does the rise in temperature cause the total volume of the system to increase? If so, how do I calculate the change in volume? I think I'm supposed to use the volume of the container as initial volume and use Charle's law to calculate the change but I'm not sure in this case.

Vi/Ti = Vf/Tf
0.040L/293K=Vf/372.85
Vf=0.05L
 
Physics news on Phys.org
the volume of gaseous products in the container is determined by the quantity of water. initially it is about 3.96 ml and after electolysis is will be slightly greater due to the change of liquid to gaseous products Water at NTP is considered incompressible so pressure can be neglected. Rising temp will expand the water but also the container. Not having info on the container we should neglect this effect too

.So how much water in converted?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Some of the electrical energy is "used up" in splitting the water. The excess of electrical input heats the vessel contents: the gas mixture and the remaining liquid, and these both expand.
 
gleem said:
initially it is about 3.96 ml and after electolysis is will be slightly greater due to the change of liquid to gaseous products

Does 3.96 describe the gaseous space of the container? This would make sense to me except that the initial liquid volume was 36mL. I don't understand why it's only 3.96mL.

gleem said:
So how much water in converted?

0.02798g is produced after 1 min. I used this value to solve for total temperature of the system and used that value to solve for the change in volume. Did I use the right equation to solve for change in volume?
 
NascentOxygen said:
Some of the electrical energy is "used up" in splitting the water. The excess of electrical input heats the vessel contents: the gas mixture and the remaining liquid, and these both expand.

Thank you for the clarification! I used the ideal gas law to solve for the change in volume:
upload_2015-7-13_16-9-22.png


Since pressure, moles, and gas constant were the same, I was left with this equation:
upload_2015-7-13_16-11-38.png


Was this the right equation to use?
 

Attachments

  • upload_2015-7-13_16-9-7.png
    upload_2015-7-13_16-9-7.png
    626 bytes · Views: 564
HelloCthulhu said:
Does 3.96 describe the gaseous space of the container? This would make sense to me except that the initial liquid volume was 36mL. I don't understand why it's only 3.96mL.

Yes 3.96 is the volume of gas in the container. We differ perhaps because we used different atomic wgts?

No gas law is needed. The converted water gives the additional volume. .02798 ml because the density of water is 1 gm/ml. Temperature and pressure have little affect.
 
HelloCthulhu said:
closed 40mL container for 1 min at standard external/internal pressure

I told you in another thread this is self contradicting. You can't have a closed container and a standard pressure, as the pressure changes when the gas is produced. You either have a constant volume, or constant pressure. Each time you post another iteration of this question you word it differently, but never precisely enough, so each time people help you solve slightly different problem - not knowing what the problem really is.

This is a waste of time.
 
Borek said:
I told you in another thread this is self contradicting. You can't have a closed container and a standard pressure, as the pressure changes when the gas is produced.

I apologize. Still very confused about how to create and solve these types of equations. I don't know how to solve for the final volume and pressure during electrolysis when I only know the initial temperature and volume.

Borek said:
Each time you post another iteration of this question you word it differently, but never precisely enough, so each time people help you solve slightly different problem - not knowing what the problem really is.

This is a waste of time.

You've been very patient and incredibly helpful. I apologize if it appears that I'm asking the same question over and over again. But honestly, I'm just using the same values to make it easier for me to understand. I'm basically trying to learn how to calculate internal energy under nonstandard conditions during electrolysis when only the amps, voltage, moles of the substance, initial temperature and volume of the container are known. You've helped me calculate the final temperature of the system during electrolysis. Now I'm trying to learn how to solve for the change in pressure and volume.
 
Actually, with a rigid body container the volume should be fixed and it's pressure that I'd really be solving for isn't it?
 
  • #10
HelloCthulhu said:
Actually, with a rigid body container the volume should be fixed and it's pressure that I'd really be solving for isn't it?

Yes.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
26K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
18K
Replies
6
Views
15K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K