Water flowing through a funnel

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the effectiveness of different funnel designs in accelerating water flow, specifically comparing "curve-walled" funnels to "straight-walled" funnels. The consensus is that a curvy funnel is generally superior for maximizing flow rate and minimizing turbulence, with the optimal design suggested to be an exponential horn shape. Participants noted the importance of avoiding sudden changes in flow direction to prevent vena contracta effects, which can hinder performance. Practical experimentation with various funnel shapes and sizes is encouraged to determine the best design for specific applications.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of fluid dynamics principles
  • Familiarity with the concept of vena contracta
  • Knowledge of funnel geometry and its impact on flow
  • Basic physics of potential and kinetic energy conversion
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the Borda–Carnot equation for flow dynamics
  • Explore the brachistochrone curve and its implications for funnel design
  • Investigate the properties of laminar vs. turbulent flow
  • Experiment with creating exponential horn-shaped funnels for optimal flow
USEFUL FOR

Engineers, fluid dynamics researchers, and hobbyists interested in optimizing water flow systems and funnel designs for practical applications.

wessholders
Messages
5
Reaction score
1
Will water flowing through a funnel be accelerated more by a "curve-walled" funnel rather than a "straight-walled" funnel?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF.

What are your thoughts? What reading have you been doing trying to figure this out? Can you post some links to that reading?

Also, is this for schoolwork?
 
This is for a project I am working on, not related to school work. So far I have been looking for the optimal funnel to maximize volume and acceleration. I have determined that a "narrower/tall" funnel is better for my purposes that a "wide/short" funnel. I've done this just by playing around with various funnels at the hardware store, nothing super scientific. I just couldn't help but imagine that there has to be some optimal curve, similar to the brachistochrone curve. I have read a few papers discussing flow dynamics of funnels of various angles, but not quite what I am looking for. I can't help but wonder if a simple parabola with a spout would suffice?

-WS
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: berkeman
While I understand the OP question more or less a curvy funnel is a much broader class of objects and so the answer tis almost certainly yes, curvy is better as I think is evident.
But the details are nontrivial and will depend upon a host of factors. For instance how big is the funnel ? Expected flow rates.? Differential pressure?
 
Thank you hutchphd,
While I wish that I could give you that information, I just don't have it. What made me start thinking about this is a pool toy I saw the other day that is essentially a cone with two handles on the wide end. The wide end is to be submerged and quickly pulled, resulting in a high pressure jet of water being shot out of the narrow end (photo attached). The toy is probably 8" wide at the bottom and 1.5" wide at the top, over a span of 18". Those toys all have straight sides as depicted. I had imagined that a "curvy" funnel would be better, just didn't know if there was an ideal shape.
funnel.jpg
 
Thanks for the description. That looks like an interesting toy. Does the water come out in a relatively collimated jet? I'm sure that turbulent flow is the enemy here. But it may be very subtle. I may cut up some "larger" plastic bottles and hit the pool !
 
It seems like you might try to optimize in such a way that for any fixed nozzle diameter, minimize the time to drain a given volume?
 
The aim is to avoid sudden changes in flow direction, which can lead to a "vena contracta" that will reduce the effective diameter of the funnel.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vena_contracta
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Borda–Carnot_equation

Potential energy must be smoothly converted to kinetic energy as the fluid falls through the funnel. Cross-section must change by the same ratio per unit travel along the funnel.

I believe the optimum flow will be with an exponential horn, like a reversed loud hailer, so the fluid is accelerating smoothly along the channel, without sudden changes in fluid wall pressure.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: erobz
Baluncore said:
The aim is to avoid sudden changes in flow direction, which can lead to a "vena contracta" that will reduce the effective diameter of the funnel.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vena_contracta
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Borda–Carnot_equation

Potential energy must be smoothly converted to kinetic energy as the fluid falls through the funnel. Cross-section must change by the same ratio per unit travel along the funnel.

I believe the optimum flow will be with an exponential horn, like a reversed loud hailer, so the fluid is accelerating smoothly along the channel, without sudden changes in fluid wall pressure.
hutchphd said:
Thanks for the description. That looks like an interesting toy. Does the water come out in a relatively collimated jet? I'm sure that turbulent flow is the enemy here. But it may be very subtle. I may cut up some "larger" plastic bottles and hit the pool !
Here is a short video demonstrating what I am talking about.
 
  • #10
wessholders said:
Here is a short video demonstrating what I am talking about.
I just took a video and am trying to figure out how to post it, but it does look to be relatively collimated. I am a biologist so not super versed with the vocabulary, but it appears smooth/laminar.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
6K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
2K
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
3K