Water level after melting of ice.

AI Thread Summary
When ice floating on water melts, the water level remains unchanged due to Archimedes' principle. The volume of the ice is equal to the volume of water it displaces while floating. As ice melts, it converts back to water, occupying the same volume it displaced. The expansion of water when it freezes and the subsequent contraction upon melting ensures the overall water level remains constant. Thus, the melting of floating ice does not affect the water level.
ajayraho
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
When an ice melts on water, which was initially floating on it, the water level must get increased.
Why it remains unchanged??
 
Physics news on Phys.org
ajayraho said:
When an ice melts on water, which was initially floating on it, the water level must get increased.
Why it remains unchanged??

How does the volume of the ice compare with the volume of the water produced when the ice melts?
 
Have you studied Archimedes' principle?
 
When water turns to ice, it grows. The amount of growth is exactly the amount that sticks up above the water. When it melts, it shrinks to fit exactly back inside the water level. So the water level doesn't change.
 
  • Like
Likes theodoros.mihos
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top