Water Level floating ice physics

AI Thread Summary
When ice containing a stone melts in a glass of water, the water level initially remains the same. This is because the ice displaces a volume of water equal to its weight, which remains constant as it melts. Once the stone falls to the bottom, it displaces a volume of water equal to its own volume, which is less than the volume displaced when it was in the ice. Consequently, the water level decreases after the stone sinks. The final outcome is that the water level first remains the same and then falls.
Chewy0087
Messages
368
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


another conceptual problem I'm having here, goes like this;

A piece of ice floats in a glass filled with water. The ice contains a small stone, so that when the ice has melted the stone will sink to the bottom of the glass. What will happen to the water level of the glass as firstly, the ice melts, and secondly, the stone falls to the bottom of the glass.

A)Rise then stay the same
B)Rise then fall
C)Fall then remain the same
D)Remain the same, then fall.

The Attempt at a Solution



well my thought process was like so, ice is more dense than water, and because of p = mass / volume, and the mass is the same, it's volume would be greater when it melts causing the water level to rise, however I'm confused as to the effect of it all as I'm not sure if/how to consider buoyancy...

the answer is D) and i simply can't see why, sureley when the stone is in the ice, the ice displaces the stones weight in the water, so why would the water level fall when the stone falls in?

any help would be appreciated ...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Ice is less dense than water (if floats!) While it is floating, it will displace a volume of water equal to its own weight. After it melts it will still displace a volume equal to its own weight.
(and now equal to its volume as well)

The stone displaces the stones weight in water while it is in the ice. After the stone falls in, it will only displace a volume equal to its own volume, which is less, because the stone is more dense than water.
 
great explanation, thank you
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top