Fukushima Water levels in Fukushima reactors?

  • Thread starter Thread starter FishmanGeertz
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Levels Water
AI Thread Summary
The Fukushima Daiichi reactors 1-4 lost cooling and water flow shortly after the March earthquake and tsunami, leading to core exposure. If water was not restored for 2-3 days, the cores likely melted down within 4-5 hours of losing cooling. Comparisons were made to the Three Mile Island (TMI) incident, where significant core damage occurred after only a few hours of cooling loss. Unlike TMI, Fukushima had battery-driven cooling for at least half a day, which helped protect the fuel initially. The main focus remains on the duration of cooling loss and the extent of core exposure during the crisis.
FishmanGeertz
Messages
189
Reaction score
0
If the reactors have been without water, the core melts very quickly. The Fukashima Daiichi reactors 1-4 lost cooling and water flow shortly after the march earthquake and tsunami and the cores were exposed.

If they were unable to get water flowing back into the reactors for several days, then the reactors have undoubtedly boiled themselves dry and melted down completely within a matter of about 4-5 hours after losing cooling.

I'm not sure if I have my info straight, but how long did the reactors go without any water? I heard it was 2-3 days until they started pumping seawater into them. During the TMI (three mile island) incident, the top of the rods were exposed after only a few hours of cooling loss. This resulted in roughly 90% core damage.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org


FishmanGeertz said:
During the TMI (three mile island) incident, the top of the rods were exposed after only a few hours of cooling loss. This resulted in roughly 90% core damage.

TMI2 lost cooling capability immeadiatly after SCRAM. Fukushima had battery driven cooling for at least half a day, so the fuel was safe during this time period.
Because of that, heat energy during the TMI2 accident was probably ten times the amount created in Fukushima when the fuel got uncovered. (Don't take my "ten times" seriously, I'm just guessing - but that's the overall direction)
 


clancy688 said:
TMI2 lost cooling capability immeadiatly after SCRAM. Fukushima had battery driven cooling for at least half a day, so the fuel was safe during this time period.
Because of that, heat energy during the TMI2 accident was probably ten times the amount created in Fukushima when the fuel got uncovered. (Don't take my "ten times" seriously, I'm just guessing - but that's the overall direction)

The reactors lost cooling and water flow immediately after the emergency batteries died. The main question is how long were the reactors without cooling? How much of the core was exposed?
 
Hello everyone, I am currently working on a burnup calculation for a fuel assembly with repeated geometric structures using MCNP6. I have defined two materials (Material 1 and Material 2) which are actually the same material but located in different positions. However, after running the calculation with the BURN card, I am encountering an issue where all burnup information(power fraction(Initial input is 1,but output file is 0), burnup, mass, etc.) for Material 2 is zero, while Material 1...
Hi everyone, I'm a complete beginner with MCNP and trying to learn how to perform burnup calculations. Right now, I'm feeling a bit lost and not sure where to start. I found the OECD-NEA Burnup Credit Calculational Criticality Benchmark (Phase I-B) and was wondering if anyone has worked through this specific benchmark using MCNP6? If so, would you be willing to share your MCNP input file for it? Seeing an actual working example would be incredibly helpful for my learning. I'd be really...

Similar threads

Replies
38
Views
16K
Replies
19
Views
5K
Replies
34
Views
14K
Replies
22
Views
7K
Replies
4
Views
11K
Replies
28
Views
8K
Replies
6
Views
3K
Back
Top