Water Pressure in a Sealed Vessel

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the pressure dynamics in a sealed steel pressure vessel containing water and a material at elevated temperatures. Participants explore the implications of water's thermal expansion and compressibility, as well as the structural integrity of the vessel under these conditions.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • A participant describes the setup involving a steel pressure vessel and Teflon container, noting the expected head-space pressure of approximately 40 bar at 250°C.
  • Concerns are raised about the volume of water expanding to 300 mL at 250°C, exceeding the vessel's capacity, potentially leading to significantly higher pressures.
  • Another participant mentions the incompressibility of liquids, using an example of hydrolock in an engine to illustrate the consequences of exceeding volume limits.
  • Discussion includes the bulk modulus of steel compared to water, suggesting that the effective bulk modulus of the vessel may be similar to that of the liquid inside.
  • Questions are posed about the thermal expansion of the container and its potential impact on pressure calculations.
  • A participant shares calculations using isothermal compressibility values for water, expressing doubts about the accuracy of these values and highlighting discrepancies in literature regarding compressibility at different temperatures.
  • Further calculations are presented, leading to a pressure estimate of 2300 bar, which one participant finds dubious.
  • Another participant provides a coefficient of volume thermal expansion for Teflon, suggesting that this should also be considered in the calculations.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express uncertainty regarding the correct values for water's compressibility and the implications for pressure in the vessel. There is no consensus on the accuracy of the calculations or the expected pressure outcomes.

Contextual Notes

Participants note limitations in the available compressibility data for water at elevated temperatures, as well as the need to account for the thermal expansion of both the water and the Teflon container in pressure calculations.

Dyslexic Poet
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hello,

I am a PhD student in chemistry, and need to determine the pressure of a reaction to be carried out

I have a steel pressure vessel with an inner Teflon container (total volume = 270 mL) which is placed in an oven at 250°C. I wish to put 240 mL of water into this container (along with 1 g of material). At this temperature, I know that the head-space pressure to be approximately 40 bar. However, the relative specific volume of water at 250°C (to that at RT) is 1.25. I believe this means that my water wants to take up a volume of 300 mL. As this is 30 mL larger than the container itself, I am not sure if it will therefore be exerting an extra pressure much larger than the head-space pressure.

I've tried a few different ways to calculate a value for this second pressure, but to no avail. One was to use water's compressibility and bulk modulus, but keep ending up with a value upwards of 2500 bar, which is just ridiculous.

Any help would be appreciated in helping me solve my problem. Please ask if I have left out any information required of the system.

Thanks,
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Dyslexic Poet said:
I've tried a few different ways to calculate a value for this second pressure, but to no avail. One was to use water's compressibility and bulk modulus, but keep ending up with a value upwards of 2500 bar, which is just ridiculous.

If the liquid wants to occupy a volume greater than the 270 cc that you have available for it, that number is not at all unreasonable. Liquids are pretty much incompressible.

To really appreciate just how incompressible liquids can be, you have to tear down and rebuild an automobile engine that has been destroyed by hydrolock: If the volume of the combustion chamber at maximum compression is 40 cc and somehow you've allowed more than 40 cc of liquid into the cylinder before the piston comes up... The piston doesn't come up and compress the liquid down to 40 cc. Instead, the piston stops cold and the connecting rod (which is a no-kidding serious piece of steel) bends or breaks.
 
The bulk modulus of steel is about 160 GPa compared with 2.2 GPa for water, but to get the "bulk stiffness" of the pressure vessel you have to reduce the 160 by a factor of the order of (thickness/length) of the vessel. So the effective bulk modulus of the vessel could be a similar order of magnitude as the bulk modulus of the liquid inside.

The fact that you would probably need to expand the volume of the pressure vessel by a few percent without bursting it should be enough to see this isn't a realistic situation, without doing a more "accurate" calculation.
 
Does the container also expand with temperature? By how much?


Chet
 
Thank you for the replies.

I can tell you that the width of the vessel walls are 10 mm. The Teflon container will expand, but I don't believe by any significant amount.

The same experiment has been carried out successfully (many dozens of times), in a similar container with a total volume of 90 mL (it's walls are 15 mm thick). For this, only 80 mL of water was used, so the ratios are kept constant. This vessel is sitting on my desk looking absolutely fine, which suggests to me that the pressure couldn't be that high.

I have this calculation, but I am dubious of it:

Volume of bomb: 270 mL
Volume of water at 20-25 C placed in bomb: 240 mL
Volume of water at 250 C: 1.25x240 = 300 mL (www.engineeringtoolbox.com/water-thermal-properties-d_162.html)

Isothermal compressibility of water, k: 4.8 x 10-10 Pa-1 (at 100°C - this value I believe to be incorrect, and I will explain in a moment why I am using its value at only 100°C)

k = - (1/V)(dV/dp)T
Δp = - (1/k) (ΔV/V) = (1/4.8x10-10)(30/270)
Δp = 2300 bar

The following link is to the site where I took this k value from (which unfortunately only goes up to 100°C): http://physchem.kfunigraz.ac.at/sm/Service/Water/H2Obetat.htm

However, I have in front of me three literature articles that state that at 100°C, k = 49.1 x 106 bar-1 (4.91 x 1012 Pa-1). Which is 20 orders of magnitude apart. My thermal physics knowledge runs out completely here, and have no idea which is right and why.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Dyslexic Poet said:
Thank you for the replies.

I can tell you that the width of the vessel walls are 10 mm. The Teflon container will expand, but I don't believe by any significant amount.

The same experiment has been carried out successfully (many dozens of times), in a similar container with a total volume of 90 mL (it's walls are 15 mm thick). For this, only 80 mL of water was used, so the ratios are kept constant. This vessel is sitting on my desk looking absolutely fine, which suggests to me that the pressure couldn't be that high.

I have this calculation, but I am dubious of it:

Volume of bomb: 270 mL
Volume of water at 20-25 C placed in bomb: 240 mL
Volume of water at 250 C: 1.25x240 = 300 mL (www.engineeringtoolbox.com/water-thermal-properties-d_162.html)

Isothermal compressibility of water, k: 4.8 x 10-10 Pa-1 (at 100°C - this value I believe to be incorrect, and I will explain in a moment why I am using its value at only 100°C)

k = - (1/V)(dV/dp)T
Δp = - (1/k) (ΔV/V) = (1/4.8x10-10)(30/270)
Δp = 2300 bar

The following link is to the site where I took this k value from (which unfortunately only goes up to 100°C): http://physchem.kfunigraz.ac.at/sm/Service/Water/H2Obetat.htm

However, I have in front of me three literature articles that state that at 100°C, k = 49.1 x 106 bar-1 (4.91 x 1012 Pa-1). Which is 20 orders of magnitude apart. My thermal physics knowledge runs out completely here, and have no idea which is right and why.


The 4.8x10-10 is correct.

Incidentally, the coefficient of volume thermal expansion for teflon is 3x10-4 per degree C. So the volume of the teflon container will increase significantly also. See what happens if you take this into account.

Chet
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 43 ·
2
Replies
43
Views
14K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
7K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
5K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
5K