Water Rise in Cappilary Tube - Where does the energy come from?

AI Thread Summary
When a capillary tube is immersed in water, the water rises due to adhesion forces between the water molecules and the tube's walls. This process involves the internal energy of the water molecules, which contributes to the work done against gravity. The energy transition occurs as potential energy from hydrogen bonding is converted into gravitational potential energy, causing the water column to rise. Additionally, the formation of these bonds releases energy, while breaking them requires energy input. Overall, the rise of water in a capillary tube is a result of the interplay between adhesion forces and energy transformations.
xCross
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
If a small tube (capillary tube) is dipped into the water, the water level rises. Which means someone is doing work on the water to rise it against gravity. My question is, who is doing this work?
My guess is the internal energy of the molecules is doing the work. That also means that temperature decreases slightly when rising the water. Is this the case?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
This is what i think:
Adhesion forces btn water molecules and the walls of the tube do the work of moving water up.
 
Sum said:
This is what i think:
Adhesion forces btn water molecules and the walls of the tube do the work of moving water up.

My guess:
If adhesion forces are kind of electrostatic forces, then the work is done by the electrostatic energy.
 
Yes, its the adhesion force (hydrogen bonding for water). In terms of energy, there is potential energy stored in the broken chemical bond. When the water and tube form a hydrogen bond, the chemical potential energy is released and becomes gravitational potential energy, i.e. the column of water rises. Forming chemical bonds releases potential energy (think explosives), and breaking bonds requires energy. To get a drop of water off a piece of glass, you have put energy in, such as by heating it or pulling it with a dropper.
 
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
This has been discussed many times on PF, and will likely come up again, so the video might come handy. Previous threads: https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/is-a-treadmill-incline-just-a-marketing-gimmick.937725/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/work-done-running-on-an-inclined-treadmill.927825/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/how-do-we-calculate-the-energy-we-used-to-do-something.1052162/
Back
Top