Wave equation boundary problem

Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around solving a wave equation with specific initial and boundary conditions using D'Alembert's solution. The user attempts to incorporate the functions f(x) and g(n) into the solution while ensuring they satisfy the odd function requirement for proper application of D'Alembert's formula. They express concerns about whether their method for achieving the boundary condition y(0,t) = 0 is correct and seek validation of their calculations. Feedback indicates that while their approach appears generally correct, a clearer final presentation of the solution is necessary for assessment. The importance of understanding the movement of wave fronts and the correct application of functions in the context of the problem is emphasized.
  • #31
Chestermiller said:
There are not two different solutions to the problem. There is only one solution to the problem, but it is described in two different spatial regions by two separate equations. There is a discontinuity in the solution at x = ct. The region x < ct is described by one equation. The region x > ct is described by the other equation.The boundary condition does not apply to this region of the solution.

It doesn't satisfy the initial conditions because we must have made a mistake in the solution.

Chet

Okay but where do you think the mistake is? I did exactly as it was done in the document you linked here...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
Chestermiller said:
There are not two different solutions to the problem. There is only one solution to the problem, but it is described in two different spatial regions by two separate equations. There is a discontinuity in the solution at x = ct. The region x < ct is described by one equation. The region x > ct is described by the other equation.The boundary condition does not apply to this region of the solution.

There is no mistake in our solution. The initial condition is at t = 0. What is the region covered by 0<x<ct at t = 0?

Chet

The region covered is

For 0≤x<ct, ##Y=\frac{3}{8}(e^{-(x+2t)^2}-e^{-(x-2t)^2})##

so now at t = 0 the whole equation becomes 0...but it should be ## \ e^{-x^2} \ ##
 
  • #33
JI567 said:
Okay but where do you think the mistake is? I did exactly as it was done in the document you linked here...
I've corrected my previous response. Our solution actually is correct. See the change that I made in my response.

Chet
JI567 said:
The region covered is

For 0≤x<ct, ##Y=\frac{3}{8}(e^{-(x+2t)^2}-e^{-(x-2t)^2})##

so now at t = 0 the whole equation becomes 0...but it should be ## \ e^{-x^2} \ ##
But the region has no spatial extent at t = 0: 0<x<0.

Chet
 
  • #34
Chestermiller said:
I've corrected my previous response. Our solution actually is correct. See the change that I made in my response.

Chet

But the region has no spatial extent at t = 0: 0<x<0.

Chet

Okay so we just ignore this region as its range is just 0. Ct < x < infinity results in 0<x<infinity when t is 0 which is the semi infinite domain and the question only states initial conditions satisfies the semi infinite domain so we just consider that region for satisfying the initial conditions.

And as for the boundary condition as it states y(0,t) = 0 so now we can't take Ct<x<infinity as t is not 0 so x in this region can't be 0 as a result we ignore this region. Now 0 ≤ x < ct for this range x can have a value of 0 even when t is not 0 so boundary condition applies only to this region.

Is my understanding of this thing correct?
 
  • #35
JI567 said:
Okay so we just ignore this region as its range is just 0. Ct < x < infinity results in 0<x<infinity when t is 0 which is the semi infinite domain and the question only states initial conditions satisfies the semi infinite domain so we just consider that region for satisfying the initial conditions.

And as for the boundary condition as it states y(0,t) = 0 so now we can't take Ct<x<infinity as t is not 0 so x in this region can't be 0 as a result we ignore this region. Now 0 ≤ x < ct for this range x can have a value of 0 even when t is not 0 so boundary condition applies only to this region.

Is my understanding of this thing correct?
Yes.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K