Wave Equation with initial conditions, boundary condtions

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the wave equation with initial and boundary conditions, specifically focusing on the application of D'Alembert's formula and the properties of odd functions in this context.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the implications of odd functions for the initial conditions of the wave equation and question how to extend these conditions appropriately. There is a discussion about defining new functions to satisfy the odd function requirement.

Discussion Status

The conversation is ongoing, with participants sharing their thoughts on how to approach the problem. Some have attempted to clarify their understanding of D'Alembert's solution, while others are considering alternative function definitions to meet the problem's requirements.

Contextual Notes

There is uncertainty regarding the correct extension of initial conditions to ensure they are odd functions, and participants are navigating this without a clear consensus on the next steps.

mmmboh
Messages
401
Reaction score
0
ojfq7p.jpg


So, I do not think I did this properly, but if f(-x)=-f(x), then u(-x,0)=-u(x,0), and if g(-x)=-g(x), then ut(-x,0)=-ut(x,0).

According to D`Alambert`s formula,

u(x,t)=[f(x+t)+f(x-t)]/2 + 0.5∫g(s)ds (from x-t to x+t)
so, u(0,t)=[f(t)+f(-t)]/2 + 0.5∫g(s)ds (from -t to t)

f is odd, and so is g, so the equation ends up giving zero, as required. But I don`t think that`s what we have to do. How do do I extend the initial conditions so that f(-x)=-f(x)? and the same for g(x). I know how to create an odd function, I can just let h(x)=xf(x2), then h(-x)=-h(x), but I`m not sure what I`m suppose to do.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
anyone?
 
Write doen D'Almberts solution, what do you get?
 
What do you mean? I thought I did write it down,
<br /> u(x,t)=\frac{1}{2}[f(x-t)+f(x+t)]+\frac{1}{2}\int_{x-t}^{x+t} g(s)ds<br />
 
Hm, I think I got it, I`ll try to post it soon.
 
If you've done it, post it otherwise we can go from there. My first thought would be to define two new functions a,b, such that:
<br /> a(x)=\left\{\begin{array}{cc}<br /> f(x) &amp; x\geqslant 0 \\<br /> -f(x) &amp; x&lt;0<br /> \end{array}\right.<br />
Likewise fot b and work from there.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K