Wave vs Waves: Understanding the Difference in Continuous Disturbances

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter spaghetti3451
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Wave Waves
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the conceptual distinction between a single wave and multiple waves in the context of continuous disturbances. Participants explore various scenarios, including physical examples and theoretical considerations, to understand how these terms apply in different situations.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose that a continuous disturbance can be viewed as a single wave, while others argue that it may represent multiple waves depending on the context.
  • A participant describes a scenario involving a rock dropped in a pond, suggesting that the resulting ring of disturbance does not constitute a continuous wave.
  • Another participant mentions that a traveling wave can be observed when whipping a long rope, indicating that the term 'wave' can apply to both single and multiple disturbances.
  • Some participants express uncertainty about how to classify an ideal solitary wave, questioning whether it should be termed a "wave" or "waves."
  • There is a mention of wave decomposition into constituent components, suggesting that waves can often be analyzed in terms of their individual characteristics.
  • One participant notes that typical wave properties such as amplitude, phase, and frequency are associated with the concept of a singular wave, particularly in the context of electronics.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on whether a continuous disturbance constitutes a single wave or multiple waves, indicating that multiple competing views remain in the discussion.

Contextual Notes

Some participants highlight the complexity of the question, suggesting that definitions and interpretations may vary based on specific scenarios and contexts.

spaghetti3451
Messages
1,311
Reaction score
31
Does a disturbance (that is continuous) propagating away from a point constitute just one single wave? Or does it constitute more than one wave?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't have an answer. But if a rock drop in a still pond, it generate a ring of disturbance and propagate out like a ring. Behind the ring, it is all still again. I would not consider it is continuous and is one single wave propagating outwards.

But if you have a continuous disturbance at the origin like you described, even the wave propagate out, it is ONE continuous wave.

That's how I see it.
 
Funnily enough, exactly this question came up in discussion with colleagues the other day. Generally, we favoured 'wave', even for a continuous sinusoidal disturbance, but we didn't think there was much wrong with 'waves', either!

What I don't think is good is to divide a sinusoidal wave profile into portions each a wavelength long, and reserve the term 'wave' for each portion. But then nobody was suggesting doing so!
 
what if you take a long rope and give a good whip as you finish your motion right on the ground? Guess what...you are going to see a single wave...this is called a "traveling wave" and it happens in the real world in many places...I, for one, found them during college studies in power transmission lines.

On the other hand, I am not about the semantics...it seems as if a wave is wave whether it is a single distortion or multiples one in sequence...the word 'waves' seems to be applicable when you actually have waves of different source or frequency, etc, you know what I mean.
 
Usually it is both...Generally, waves can be decomposed into constitutent components...sums, products,etc...

An easy way to think about it is any trigonometric identity function:

for example:

Sin (x +y) = Sin(x)Cos(y) + Cos(x)Sin(y)

or

Sin2x = 2SinxCosx
 
yungman said:
I don't have an answer. But if a rock drop in a still pond, it generate a ring of disturbance and propagate out like a ring. Behind the ring, it is all still again. I would not consider it is continuous and is one single wave propagating outwards.

But if you have a continuous disturbance at the origin like you described, even the wave propagate out, it is ONE continuous wave.

I don't think the question is easily answered. Would one characterize an ideal solitary wave as a "wave" or "waves"?
 
olivermsun said:
I don't think the question is easily answered. Would one characterize an ideal solitary wave as a "wave" or "waves"?

That's why I said I don't have an answer, just my opinion.
 
Well, amplitude, phase, frequency, wavelength, all these typical wave-ish terms are applicable to a "wave" (singular), which is a continuous sinewave. Or at least that's what comes to mind when you think about it in electronics domain.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 47 ·
2
Replies
47
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K