Wavefunction Evolution Problem: Solving for \phi_1

Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
1 reply · 2K views
Domnu
Messages
176
Reaction score
0
Problem
Describe the evolution in time of [tex]\phi_1 = A \sin \omega t \cos k(x+ct)[/tex].

Attempt at Solution
We have that

[tex]\partial^2 \phi_1 / \partial x^2 = -Ak^2 \sin \omega t \cos k(x+ct)[/tex]
[tex]\partial \phi_1 / \partial t = A \sin \omega t (-kc \cdot \sin k(x+ct)) + A \omega \cos \omega t \cos k(x+ct)[/tex]

Now, by Schroedinger's Equation,

[tex]-h^2/2m \cdot \partial^2\phi_1 / \partial x^2 = i \hbar \cdot \partial \phi_1 / \partial[/tex]

So, substituting, we have

[tex]\hbar^2 / 2m \cdot Ak^2 \sin \omega t \cos k(x+ct) = ihA \sin \omega t \cdot kc \sin k(x+ct) - i\hbar A \omega \cos \omega t \cos k(x+ct)[/tex]

[tex]\iff \hbar^2/2m \cdot k^2 \cdot \sin \omega t = i \hbar \sin \omega t \tan k(x+ct) - i \hbar \omega \cos \omega t[/tex]

[tex]\iff \hbar^2/2m \cdot k^2 = i\hbar \tan k(x+ct) - i \hbar \omega \cot \omega t[/tex]

[tex]\iff \hbar k^2 = i \cdot 2m (\tan \k(x+ct) - \omega \cot \omega t)[/tex]

Is this it? What am I to do now?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What is [itex]\phi[/itex]?

(Sidenote: Looking at the function, the first term is a time dependent term whereas the second term is basically a "traveling wave" (for want of a better term...its actually the wavefunction of a free particle).)

I don't know what [itex]\phi[/itex] is, but if its the total wavefunction (we usually use [itex]\psi(x,t)[/itex] for it..lol :-p) and if your algebra is correct, the last equation doesn't make sense: the left hand side is a constant, whereas the right hand side is a function of space and time...for it to hold, [itex]x+ct[/itex] and [itex]\omega t[/itex] both should be constants (by a simple argument).

You could play around a bit by writing the whole thing as a bunch of complex exponentials, using Euler's Theorem...

[tex]\phi(x,t) = A\left(\frac{e^{i\omega t}-e^{-i\omega t}}{2i}\right)\left(\frac{e^{i(kx+kct)}+e^{-i(kx+kct)}}{2}\right)[/tex]

See if that helps...