Weak Form of the Effective Mass Schrodinger Equation

Morberticus
Messages
82
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I am numerically solving the 2D effective-mass Schrodinger equation

\nabla \cdot (\frac{-\hbar^2}{2} c \nabla \psi) + (U - \epsilon) \psi = 0

where c is the effective mass matrix

\left( \begin{array}{cc}<br /> 1/m^*_x &amp; 1/m^*_{xy} \\<br /> 1/m^*_{yx} &amp; 1/m^*_y \\<br /> \end{array} \right)

I know that, when the effective mass is isotropic, the weak form is
\int \frac{-\hbar^2}{2m^*}\nabla \psi \cdot \nabla v + U\psi vd\Omega = \int \epsilon \psi vd\Omega

The matrix is giving me trouble however. Is this the correct form?

\int \frac{-\hbar^2}{2m^*_x}\frac{\partial u}{\partial x}\frac{ \partial v}{\partial x} + \frac{-\hbar^2}{2m^*_{xy}}\frac{\partial u}{\partial x}\frac{ \partial v}{\partial y} + \frac{-\hbar^2}{2m^*_{yx}}\frac{\partial u}{\partial y}\frac{ \partial v}{\partial x} + \frac{-\hbar^2}{2m^*_y}\frac{\partial u}{\partial y}\frac{ \partial v}{\partial y} + U\psi v d\Omega= \int \epsilon \psi v d\Omega
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm sorry you are not generating any responses at the moment. Is there any additional information you can share with us? Any new findings?
 
Hi. I have got question as in title. How can idea of instantaneous dipole moment for atoms like, for example hydrogen be consistent with idea of orbitals? At my level of knowledge London dispersion forces are derived taking into account Bohr model of atom. But we know today that this model is not correct. If it would be correct I understand that at each time electron is at some point at radius at some angle and there is dipole moment at this time from nucleus to electron at orbit. But how...
Back
Top