Weight Transfer in Car Tires, and Suspension

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on the dynamics of weight transfer in car tires during acceleration and turning, utilizing specific formulas for linear acceleration and centripetal force. The key formula for linear acceleration is ΔWeight = (accel) * (height of center of mass) * (mass) / (wheelbase). The conversation highlights the impact of suspension stiffness on weight distribution, noting that a stiffer suspension results in greater weight transfer to the outside tire during cornering, affecting grip levels. The book "Race Car Vehicle Dynamics" by Milliken and Milliken is recommended for a comprehensive understanding of these dynamics.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of basic physics principles related to acceleration and force
  • Familiarity with vehicle dynamics concepts, particularly weight transfer
  • Knowledge of suspension systems and their characteristics (spring constant)
  • Access to "Race Car Vehicle Dynamics" by Milliken and Milliken for in-depth study
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the effects of suspension stiffness on weight distribution in vehicles
  • Learn about the relationship between downforce and tire grip
  • Explore advanced vehicle dynamics simulations to visualize weight transfer
  • Study the impact of center of mass movement on vehicle handling during different maneuvers
USEFUL FOR

Automotive engineers, race car designers, and enthusiasts interested in understanding vehicle dynamics and optimizing suspension setups for performance driving.

jonesto95
I've been looking up how weight transfers between car tires in various forms of acceleration, and I've found some formulas. For linear acceleration, I found this formula on Wikipedia:

ΔWeight = (accel) * (height of center of mass) * (mass) / (wheelbase)

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Weight_transfer

And I also found this inequality for a turning car, where a car won't roll over as long as

(centripetal force) / (weight + downforce) < (wheel track / (2 * height of center of mass))

accidentreconstruction.com/research/suv/rollovers[1].pdf

However, the second link mentions how it ignores suspension effects, which made me think: How would those effects play into these two equations? In other words, under the same amount of acceleration and/or centripetal acceleration, how would the amount of transferred weight differ between a stiff suspension (high spring constant), and a soft suspension (low spring constant)?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Sounds like they are treating the problem in the typical rigid body fashion. With suspension effect, the location of the center of mass will move.
 
From what I've been looking at, that does seem to be the only way suspension plays into this. I can only see the CoM moving vertically though. Can it move horizontally (relative to the car axis) along the car, and if so, how?
 
Have a look at "Race Car Vehicle Dynamics" by Milliken and Milliken, if you can. It gives an excellent treatment of the your problem area.
 
Yes, CoM will move vertically and horizontally. When the car is accelerating, the CoM will move back...when breaking, forward...when turning, sideways
 
Oh my. I found that book. This thing is amazing, VERY nice find!
 
Good. It has been the 'bible' for many involved in racing for some time. It should answer most of your questions.
 
The total cornering load can't be changed, but it can be distributed unevenly between the front and rear tires by making the front or rear end suspension relatively (compared to forward / rearward weight bias) stiffer. The stiffer end (springs and/or roll bar) gets more of a different in weight distribution (greater downforce on the outside tire, less downforce on the inner tire), than the looser end. Since the coefficient of friction of a tire decreases somewhat with an increase in downforce, the stiffer end will have less maximum grip than the looser end of a car, and this is how oversteer / understeer can be tuned with suspension stiffness.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 49 ·
2
Replies
49
Views
5K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
6K