Weinberg 3.4 -- Derive the perturbation expansion....

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a problem from Weinberg's textbook on quantum field theory, specifically focusing on deriving the perturbation expansion from an existing expansion in old-fashioned perturbation theory. The original poster expresses difficulty in progressing with the problem and seeks assistance.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to insert the Fourier representation of energy factors into a specific equation and manipulate the resulting expression to derive a desired form. They express uncertainty about the integration limits in the perturbation series.

Discussion Status

Some participants provide guidance on using LaTeX for formatting equations and emphasize the need for the original poster to share their work or approach for further assistance. The discussion includes a mix of attempts and bumps, indicating ongoing engagement without a clear resolution.

Contextual Notes

The original poster mentions their lack of experience with LaTeX and the complexity of their work, which spans multiple pages. There is an implication of a long-standing struggle with the problem, as noted by another participant.

kushal3553
Messages
4
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Basically I wanted to see if anyone would be willing to give me the solution to the 4th problem of the Weinberg textbook on quantum field theory. The exact question in the book is "Derive the perturbation expansion (3.5.8) directly from the expansion (3.5.3) of old-fashioned perturbation theory."

Homework Equations


The relevant equations include the Fourier representation of energy, the Dyson series for the s-matrix, etc.

The Attempt at a Solution



S[/B]o I'm new to physicsforums so I have no idea how to do physics equations on the computer using what I think is called latex. Also, my work spans quite a few pages but I don't think I've gotten anywhere that would be all that useful in solving the problem.Thank you in advance to those that are willing to help!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
To type in latex, simply use the $ or # wrappers and write in the familiar latex codes. For example, you can quote my post to see how I wrote the below equation: $$S=\int_a^b \mathcal{L} dt$$

You will have to show some of your work, or at least tell us about your approach, before someone will help you here. :)
 
Ok, so basically I inserted the Fourier representation of the energy factors into eq. (3.5.3) and came up with a factor of $$e^(iE_a * t) * V_(by)*V_(ya) * e^(-iE_y * t)$$ within the two integrals and I thought maybe I could get V(t) somewhere through that and the rest of my work has to do with manipulating the expression in the integral to maybe get $$<phi_a|V(t)|phi_b>$$ by the end of the expression. I was unsuccessful in this endeavor and I noticed that in (3.5.8) many of the integrals run from negative infinity to t_n which I have no idea how that can be derived from the old-fashioned perturbation series.
 
bump
 
bump
 
kushal3553 said:
bump
You seriously have made no progress in the last 3 years on this?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
7K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
7K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K