Weird wording, can't understand what they want

  • Thread starter Thread starter Feodalherren
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Weird
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around understanding the concept of total acceleration in circular motion, particularly in relation to a particle moving clockwise in a circle. Participants express confusion about the meaning of "total acceleration" and its components, including radial and tangential acceleration. It is clarified that total acceleration includes both centripetal and tangential components, and that non-zero tangential acceleration can occur even in circular motion. The importance of correctly representing the resultant vector in relation to these accelerations is emphasized, with the understanding that the total acceleration is the vector sum of radial and tangential accelerations. Overall, the conversation highlights the complexities of interpreting acceleration in circular dynamics.
Feodalherren
Messages
604
Reaction score
6

Homework Statement


Figure P4.31 represents the total acceleration of a particle
moving clockwise in a circle of radius 2.50 m at a certain
instant of time. At this instant, find (a) the radial acceleration,
(b) the speed of the particle, and (c) its tangential
acceleration.

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution


I probably don't need help with the problem per se. I just need help understanding what they want from me. What in god's name do they mean with "represents the total acceleration"!? The figure is just a circle that shows the radius, an angle, the velocity vector and an acceleration vector that is not centripetal. Oh yeah, and it says a=15m/s^2
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Total acceleration is the acceleration vector you are given. You are given its magnitude and, apparently, its angle with the velocity vector.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
http://www.csupomona.edu/~skboddeker/131/131hw/ch4h.htm
It's 4.5 on there.

Thanks Voko!

I'm still sort of confused... If there is another acceleration aside from the centripetal, then the object wouldn't be traveling in a circular path at all. Wouldn't it actually be moving further away from the center in this case?

Also, when I draw the resultant vector, how do I know if I'm supposed to draw it from from the centripetal acceleration to the total acceleration or vice versa, or does it not matter and why?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
As shown in the diagram, total acceleration is the vector sum of radial acceleration and tangential acceleration.

It is perfectly possible to have non-zero tangential acceleration in circular motion. Consider a wheel initially at rest. Then at some point it is spinning with some constant speed. Clearly it must have had tangential acceleration between these two states. Yet all of its points can only move circularly.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top