What about U-236 makes it unstable?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Xaviermuskie
  • Start date Start date
Xaviermuskie
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
What about U-236 makes it unstable? I know what happens to U-236, the fission and the release of neutrons and what not, but what about the absorption of a neutron makes a U-235 unstable, especially when U-238 does it so effortlessly.

Thank you.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Both U235 and U238 are unstable after neutron interaction. U235 usually fissions, while U239 (after neutron absorption) goes through succesive beta decays to Np239 followed by Pu239 (the other important bomb material). The details of why any specific chain of events occurs is quite complicated, although all species with At. no. greater than 82 are unstable.
 
Xaviermuskie said:
What about U-236 makes it unstable?

Both U-236 and U-238 are unstable to alpha decay. Of the two, U-238 is more stable. In other words, it is unstable because of alpha emission.

Carl
 
Thread 'Why is there such a difference between the total cross-section data? (simulation vs. experiment)'
Well, I'm simulating a neutron-proton scattering phase shift. The equation that I solve numerically is the Phase function method and is $$ \frac{d}{dr}[\delta_{i+1}] = \frac{2\mu}{\hbar^2}\frac{V(r)}{k^2}\sin(kr + \delta_i)$$ ##\delta_i## is the phase shift for triplet and singlet state, ##\mu## is the reduced mass for neutron-proton, ##k=\sqrt{2\mu E_{cm}/\hbar^2}## is the wave number and ##V(r)## is the potential of interaction like Yukawa, Wood-Saxon, Square well potential, etc. I first...
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
10K
Replies
20
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
5K
Back
Top