What actually are electron holes?

  • Thread starter Thread starter I_am_learning
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Electron Holes
I_am_learning
Messages
681
Reaction score
16
What actually are electron holes?

I have come to read that electron holes are nothing but the blank space that is left behind when an electron is missing in a crystal where it ought to have been present. I have also learned that the movement of holes are due to adjacent electrons jumping into the holes (hence creating a hole in its former position). So a hole movement in one direction is created by electron movement in another direction.

But what bothers me is the Hall Effect. Hall Voltage in some metals like Zn are positive which is only possible if the charge carriers are positive.
Saying that holes are a kind of positive charge carrier doesn't answer the riddle because the holes movement are actually the electron movement in the other direction! so the magnetic force acts on these electron and hence negative Hall voltage should have been established?!.

Whats the point I am missing here?
 
Physics news on Phys.org


The "effective mass" of an electron is given by the curvature of the band. Hence electrons near the top of a band have a negative mass and also the velocity is anti-parallel to the driving force. So you are right, the electrons really move in the other direction than what you would expect if they were free. The hole picture fits in here nicely. A missing electron of negative mass will behave like a particle with positive mass. The reason for the negative effective mass is that an increase in the crystal momentum of the electrons will lead to an increased Bragg scattering of the electrons. Near the top of the band, this increase in the backscattered wave outweights the increase in crystal momentum.
 


So, you mean that, when measuring Hall voltage, the magnetic force causes the electron drift towards negative direction due to its effective negative mass so that the hall voltage is +ve. Thank you, I understand that.
But, shouldn't it be emphasized that holes are not merely absent of electrons but absent of electrons with negative effective mass?
 


Yes, and I think any good book on solid state theory does that (try e.g. Ashcroft/ Mermin).
 
From the BCS theory of superconductivity is well known that the superfluid density smoothly decreases with increasing temperature. Annihilated superfluid carriers become normal and lose their momenta on lattice atoms. So if we induce a persistent supercurrent in a ring below Tc and after that slowly increase the temperature, we must observe a decrease in the actual supercurrent, because the density of electron pairs and total supercurrent momentum decrease. However, this supercurrent...
Hi. I have got question as in title. How can idea of instantaneous dipole moment for atoms like, for example hydrogen be consistent with idea of orbitals? At my level of knowledge London dispersion forces are derived taking into account Bohr model of atom. But we know today that this model is not correct. If it would be correct I understand that at each time electron is at some point at radius at some angle and there is dipole moment at this time from nucleus to electron at orbit. But how...
Back
Top