What actually are Newton's axioms of classical mechanics

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the axioms of Newtonian classical mechanics, specifically questioning whether Newton's three laws are separate statements that collectively form the axioms or if they are the axioms themselves. Participants draw parallels between Newton's laws and other formulations of classical mechanics, such as the Euler-Lagrange differential equation and Hamiltonian equations. The conversation highlights the need for a clearer mathematical formulation of Newton's principles, suggesting that Newton did not adopt an axiomatic approach but rather relied on Euclidean geometry as a framework for his observations in "Principia."

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Newton's three laws of motion
  • Familiarity with classical mechanics terminology
  • Knowledge of Euclidean geometry principles
  • Basic comprehension of differential equations
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the Euler-Lagrange differential equation in classical mechanics
  • Explore Hamiltonian mechanics and its equations
  • Study the Poisson bracket and its applications in mechanics
  • Investigate the historical context of Newton's "Principia" and its mathematical foundations
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, educators in classical mechanics, and researchers interested in the foundational principles of Newtonian mechanics will benefit from this discussion.

V0ODO0CH1LD
Messages
278
Reaction score
0
Just like the Euler-Lagrange differential equation
$$ \frac{\partial{\mathcal{L}}}{\partial{q}} = \frac{d}{dt}\frac{\partial{\mathcal{L}}}{\partial{\dot{q}}} $$
the hamiltonian equations
$$ \frac{\partial{H}} {\partial{q}} = -\dot{p} $$
$$ \frac{\partial{H}} {\partial{p}} = \dot{q} $$
and the poisson equation
$$ \left\{F,H\right\} = \dot{F} $$
are axioms to different formulations of classical mechanics. What are the axioms of the Newtonian formulation?

Are his three laws separate statements that together make up the axiom? Or are the laws the actual axioms? In which case, can the Newtonian formulation of classical mechanics be explicitly formulated in "standard" mathematical language?

EDIT: by non-"standard" I mean like the fact that ## F_{12}=-F_{21} ## makes no sense if not followed by subtitles. And that it only makes sense in a very specific context..
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't think Newton worked axiomatically - in Principia he used Euclids axioms for geometry implicitly, and used that framework to describe/record observations and the results of experiments.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K