What Angle Does the Muon Emerge at in Pion Decay?

AI Thread Summary
In the discussion about the decay of a pion into a muon and a neutrino, the main focus is on determining the angle at which the muon emerges when the neutrino is emitted at 90 degrees to the pion's original direction. The participants use conservation of energy and momentum principles, employing four-vector notation to set up their equations. They derive expressions for the momentum components of the muon and neutrino, ultimately aiming to find a relationship for the tangent of the angle. Acknowledgment is made that the initial velocity of the pion provides a crucial link between energy and momentum, simplifying the problem. The conversation highlights the importance of maintaining a broader perspective when solving complex physics problems.
Flux = Rad
Messages
22
Reaction score
0
I've done a countless number of these problems before, so I was quite annoyed when I was unable to do this one. It's from Griffiths' Intro to Elementary Particles.

Homework Statement



A pion traveling at speed v decays into a muon and a neutrino,
\pi^- \rightarrow \mu^- + \bar{\nu}_\mu
If the neutrino emerges at 90 degrees to the original pion direction, at what angle does the muon come off?

Homework Equations



Relativistic formulae for energy and momentum, energy and momentum conservation.

The Attempt at a Solution



Note: in the following I've set c = 1. If that bothers anyone too much, I could do it again keeping the c's in, but it's rather tedious.

I've set it up so that the pion was traveling in the \hat{x} direction, and the neutrino goes off in the \hat{y} direction.

The four vectors for the particles are:
P_\pi = \left( \begin{array}{cc} E_\pi / c \\ p_\pi \\ 0 \\ 0 \end{array} \right) \qquad P_\nu = \left( \begin{array}{cc} p_\nu \\ 0 \\ p_\nu \\ 0 \end{array} \right) \qquad P_\mu = \left( \begin{array}{cc} E_\mu / c \\ p_x \\ p_y \\ 0 \end{array} \right)

4 momentum conservation states that

P_\pi = P_\nu + P_\mu

Dotting both sides of this equation with itself, and noting that
a) the square of a 4 momentum is the rest mass of the particle
b) the neutrino is effectively massless
I get:

p_y = \frac{2 E_\mu p_\nu - m_\pi ^2 + m_\mu ^2}{2 p_\nu}

If I rearrange my initial statement of energy/momentum conservation to

P_\nu = P_\pi - P_\mu

the result of squaring this is

p_x = \frac{2 E_\pi E_\mu - m_\pi ^2 m_\mu ^2}{2 p_\pi}

This allows me to obtain an expression for the required angle, namely

\tan \theta = \frac{p_y}{p_x} = \frac{p_\pi (2 E_\mu p_\nu - m_\pi ^2 + m_\mu ^2)}{p_\nu (2 E_\pi E_\mu - m_\pi ^2 - m_\mu ^2)}

In order to get rid of the p_\nu terms, I take my conservation master equation and rearrange it to the last possible arrangement, and square:

P_\mu = P_\pi - P_\nu \quad \Rightarrow \quad P_\nu = \frac{m_\pi ^2 - m_\mu ^2}{2 E_\pi}

Substituting this into my rather messy equation for \tan \theta, I end up with:

\tan \theta = 2 \frac{p_\pi (E_\mu - E_\pi)}{2 E_\pi E_\mu - m_\pi ^2 m_\mu ^2}

Clearly this isn't satisfactory since we don't know what E_\mu is. I tried using the energy-mass-momentum relation to remedy this but I only managed to get

\tan \theta = 2 \frac{p_\pi(E_\mu - E_\pi)}{p_\mu ^2 - p_\pi ^2}

which isn't of much help either, since we now have unknown p_\mu terms floating about.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Hello,

I try this way:
P_\pi = \left( \begin{array}{cc} E_\pi / c \\ p_\pi \\ 0 \\ 0 \end{array} \right) \qquad P_\nu = \left( \begin{array}{cc} p_\nu \\ 0 \\ p_\nu \\ 0 \end{array} \right) \qquad P_\mu = \left( \begin{array}{cc} E_\mu / c \\ p_x \\ p_y \\ 0 \end{array} \right)
Actually,conservation of momentum give p_\pi=p_x and p_\nu=p_y
Therefore,
\tan\theta=\frac{p_y}{p_x}=\frac{p_\nu}{p_\pi}
where
p_\pi=\gamma m_\pi v
and
p_\nu = \frac{m_\pi ^2 - m_\mu ^2}{2 E_\pi} (you have got this relation)
Simplify further
\tan\theta=\frac{p_y}{p_x}=\frac{p_\nu}{p_\pi}=\frac{m_\pi ^2 - m_\mu ^2}{2 E_\pi}\frac{1}{\gamma m_\pi v}=\frac{m_\pi ^2 - m_\mu ^2}{2 \gamma m_\pi}\frac{1}{\gamma m_\pi v}=\frac{1}{2\gamma^2 v}\left(\frac{m_\pi ^2 - m_\mu ^2}{m^2_\pi}\right)



Best regards
 
Last edited:
Without following all of the details (sorry, it's getting late), but you haven't used at all the fact that you were given the initial velocity of the pion is 'v'. This gives you a relation between E_pi and p_pi in terms of v. That's one less variable.
 
Last edited:
Thanks for the replies, I was making things way too complicated for myself. I'm not sure if the expression I got was correct but variation's method is far more elegant and uhm... logical. Hope that'll teach me to keep an eye on the bigger picture with simpler problems.

Thanks again.
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top