What are CP maps in QM good for?

  • Thread starter Thread starter mtak0114
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Qm
mtak0114
Messages
46
Reaction score
0
Hi
I am trying to teach myself quantum mechanics and I have heard a lot about Completely Positive maps but I haven't been able to find anything on them could someone please tell me what they are and what they are good fore?

cheers

Mark
 
Physics news on Phys.org
From linear algebra point of view, a bounded operator A acting on a Hilbert space H is said to be positive (P), if for all |x\rangle\in H, \langle x|A|x\rangle\geq0.
An operator E which maps density operators of a space H_1 to H_2 is called completely positive (CP). (Now you understand why they are impotent).
Equivalently, E is completely positive, if and only if I_n\otimes E is a positive operator for all n\geq0. I_n is the identity operator. Testing an operator is CP or not is a difficult problem. The operators which are P but not CP can be used as entanglement witnesses.

For more details read Nielsen and Chuang.
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...
Back
Top