What are cyclic devices exactly?

  • Thread starter Thread starter influx
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Cyclic
AI Thread Summary
Cyclic devices operate by repeating a specific cycle, with heat pumps and refrigerators both classified as such. A heat pump functions similarly to a refrigerator, utilizing work to transfer heat, while a heat engine converts heat into work. Heat engines and heat pumps are not the same; they serve different purposes in thermodynamics. The term "engine" is too broad to categorize all engines as cyclic devices. Understanding these distinctions is crucial for comprehending thermodynamic principles.
influx
Messages
162
Reaction score
1
What are cyclic devices exactly? Are heat pumps and refrigerators both examples of cyclic devices? Also is a heat engine the same as a heat pump?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
A cyclic device is a device that operates by following some set cycle over and over again. Yes, heat pumps and refrigerators are cyclic devices.
 
dauto said:
A cyclic device is a device that operates by following some set cycle over and over again. Yes, heat pumps and refrigerators are cyclic devices.

Thanks.

Is a heat engine the same thing as a heat pump?

Lastly, are engines cyclic devices?
 
influx said:
Thanks.

Is a heat engine the same thing as a heat pump?

Lastly, are engines cyclic devices?

No, A heat pump is a refrigerator. It uses work to move heat. A heat engine uses heat to produce work. An engine is too broad a term to answer.
 
Thread 'Gauss' law seems to imply instantaneous electric field propagation'
Imagine a charged sphere at the origin connected through an open switch to a vertical grounded wire. We wish to find an expression for the horizontal component of the electric field at a distance ##\mathbf{r}## from the sphere as it discharges. By using the Lorenz gauge condition: $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A} + \frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial t}=0\tag{1}$$ we find the following retarded solutions to the Maxwell equations If we assume that...
Maxwell’s equations imply the following wave equation for the electric field $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}}{\partial t^2} = \frac{1}{\varepsilon_0}\nabla\rho+\mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf J}{\partial t}.\tag{1}$$ I wonder if eqn.##(1)## can be split into the following transverse part $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}_T-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}_T}{\partial t^2} = \mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf{J}_T}{\partial t}\tag{2}$$ and longitudinal part...
Thread 'Recovering Hamilton's Equations from Poisson brackets'
The issue : Let me start by copying and pasting the relevant passage from the text, thanks to modern day methods of computing. The trouble is, in equation (4.79), it completely ignores the partial derivative of ##q_i## with respect to time, i.e. it puts ##\partial q_i/\partial t=0##. But ##q_i## is a dynamical variable of ##t##, or ##q_i(t)##. In the derivation of Hamilton's equations from the Hamiltonian, viz. ##H = p_i \dot q_i-L##, nowhere did we assume that ##\partial q_i/\partial...
Back
Top