What Are GCT, ZPE, and Angel Light in Scientific Research?

  • Thread starter Thread starter ravenfire
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Light
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a new member seeking feedback on topics related to Gravity Control Technologies (GCT) and inventor Troy Hurtubise, particularly his latest invention, Angel Light. The member expresses surprise at the forum's diverse topics and requests opinions on the legitimacy of GCT's research on monatomic substances and zero-point field interactions. They also mention a video about Hurtubise's LIMBC armor, which they find credible but are skeptical about Angel Light. Responses highlight a perceived inconsistency in the forum's posting guidelines, questioning why certain topics like UFOs and antigravity are accepted while others are not. Some participants advocate for a more relaxed approach to the rules to encourage broader participation in discussions.
ravenfire
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Greetings everyone. I just recently signed up to the site and I wanted to post some information and get some feedback from the board. I was suprised at the variety of topics covered on this forum. I think I can get some fair but honest feedback.

Has anyone heard of GCT (Gravity Control Technologies). There research is based upon "monatomic" substances and there interactions with the ZPF.
http://www.gctspace.com/main.html

Also, is anyone familiar with an inventor by the name of Troy Hurtubise?
I have done some additional research on him and most of what he claims seems legit. Check out the video discovery did on him with his specially developed LIMBC armor. http://www.americanantigravity.com/hurtubise.shtml

His most newest invention is called angel light. I am still somewhat skeptical of this and would like to know what the general consensus of the forum is regarding this. Thanks again!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Have you seen the Angel Light demonstrated?

And you won't. :biggrin:
 
UFO's, Antigravity, John Titor and Bigfoot? These are all posted on this particular board. I guess I fail to see how they are ok but what I posted is not. Maybe I was wrong.
Oh well.
 
ravenfire said:
UFO's, Antigravity, John Titor and Bigfoot? These are all posted on this particular board. I guess I fail to see how they are ok but what I posted is not. Maybe I was wrong.
Oh well.
You're right, you asked for people's opinions on the topics, you were not presenting them as proven fact.
 
You should be skeptical, it shows promise.
 
Well it is a skepticism and debunking forum... the majority of posts in here are lacking "proven facts." I don't see anything wrong with the post. Although I rarely post myself, I do enjoy reading your discussions. I understand that you are trying to an organized board with on-topic discussions, but perhaps you could be a little less strict with the rules... that might encourage more people to join in on the discussions. Just my 2 cents.
 

Similar threads

What role should ideologies play in scientific research/studies
2
Replies
52
Views
5K
Outrunning Light; how quickly will light catch up with you
Replies
5
Views
2K
Belief and Epistemological Criteria of Being
Replies
2
Views
2K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top