I What Are Logical Operators in Electronic Circuits?

Jamison Lahman
Messages
142
Reaction score
35
While at university, we went over logical operators for our electronic circuits lab. There was one that depended on the previous value which fascinated my deeply, but for some reason I can't remember it. I only vaguely remember it so I apologize if I mess up what actually happened. From what I remember, both A and B were false. We then made one true and depending whether that was true or false, after making both true, the next switch would be dependent on the result of when one was true. I can't think of any way this would be true. Anyone that remotely knows what I'm talking about please refresh me!
cheers
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Jamison Lahman said:
YES. This is exactly it. Bless you, Jedi.
No problem. I use a lot of them in my electronics.
 
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...
Thread 'Detail of Diagonalization Lemma'
The following is more or less taken from page 6 of C. Smorynski's "Self-Reference and Modal Logic". (Springer, 1985) (I couldn't get raised brackets to indicate codification (Gödel numbering), so I use a box. The overline is assigning a name. The detail I would like clarification on is in the second step in the last line, where we have an m-overlined, and we substitute the expression for m. Are we saying that the name of a coded term is the same as the coded term? Thanks in advance.
Back
Top