What are postulates and what are derived?

  • Thread starter Thread starter I_am_learning
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Postulates
I_am_learning
Messages
681
Reaction score
16
I have now understood special Relativity and now going to study quantum mechanics. But I am having hard time to understand the proofs of different phenomenas like barrier tunneling. I am also not understanding the wave function and the de-Broglie waves.
So please anyone here could list me what are the basic postulates one has to assume in order to read-on quantum mechanics.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You'll probably struggle to understand either the wave function or de broglie waves if you just know the postulates of quantum mechanics. It sounds like you really need a proper textbook, or at the very least a decent set of lecture notes. There's billions of discussions of QM textbooks in the academic guidance/book discussion forum.
 
It looks to me that wikipedia is more rigorous here
Postulates of quantum mechanics
The following summary of the mathematical framework of quantum mechanics can be partly traced back to von Neumann's postulates.
  • Each physical system is associated with a (topologically) separable complex Hilbert space H with inner product \langle \phi | \psi \rangle. Rays (one-dimensional subspaces) in H are associated with states of the system.
  • The Hilbert space of a composite system is the Hilbert space tensor product of the state spaces associated with the component systems.
  • Physical symmetries act on the Hilbert space of quantum states unitarily or antiunitarily due to Wigner's theorem.
  • Physical observables are represented by densely-defined self-adjoint operators on H.
The expected value (in the sense of probability theory) of the observable A for the system in state represented by the unit vector | \psi \rangle \in H is
\langle\psi|A|\psi\rangle
By spectral theory, we can associate a probability measure to the values of A in any state \psi. We can also show that the possible values of the observable A in any state must belong to the spectrum of A. In the special case A has only discrete spectrum, the possible outcomes of measuring A are its eigenvalues.

More generally, a state can be represented by a so-called density operator, which is a trace class, nonnegative self-adjoint operator \rho normalized to be of trace 1. The expected value of A in the state \rho is
\text{tr}\left(A\rho\right)
If \rho_\psi is the orthogonal projector onto the one-dimensional subspace of H spanned by \psi, then
\text{tr}\left(A\rho_\psi\right)=\langle\psi|A|\psi\rangle
Density operators are those that are in the closure of the convex hull of the one-dimensional orthogonal projectors. Conversely, one-dimensional orthogonal projectors are extreme points of the set of density operators. Physicists also call one-dimensional orthogonal projectors pure states and other density operators mixed states.
To that we only need to add the dynamics. This can be defined via a Hamiltonian, a Lagrangian, (if the system has a familiar classical counterpart) the correspondance rule (replace the Poisson bracket by a(n anti)commutator), or even directly by a dispersion rule or wave equation such as the Shrodinger equation.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
Back
Top