What are the allowed energies for a quantum harmonic oscillator?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Moham1287
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Energies Sho
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the allowed energies of a quantum harmonic oscillator, exploring the relationship between different energy formulations and their implications. Participants reference Planck's postulate, the Schrödinger equation, and historical context regarding the understanding of ground state energy.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Historical

Main Points Raised

  • One participant notes the allowed energies of a quantum simple harmonic oscillator as 0, hf, 2hf, and references the Schrödinger equation yielding E(n)=(n+1/2) hbar omega, expressing confusion over the differing results.
  • Another participant clarifies that Planck's postulate pertains to electromagnetic radiation rather than the simple harmonic oscillator.
  • A participant mentions that \hbar\omega=hf, suggesting that the difference between the two energy formulations is a constant (0.5\hbar\omega) that can be disregarded.
  • One post discusses the Hamiltonians for the system, indicating that they describe the same physics as they differ only by a constant, and asserts their equivalence in the classical limit.
  • A participant references a lesser-known paper by Einstein, which introduced the concept of a non-zero ground state energy for the harmonic oscillator, although they cannot provide a citation.
  • Another participant states that according to the Schrödinger equation, a particle cannot have zero energy, as solutions yield (v+1/2)hf, and raises concerns about negative energy states in relation to the uncertainty principle.
  • A later reply acknowledges a misunderstanding regarding the original question, reiterating that Planck's work was focused on blackbody radiation while Schrödinger dealt with the quantum mechanical harmonic oscillator.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the interpretation of energy levels in the quantum harmonic oscillator, with no consensus reached on the implications of the various formulations or the historical context of the ground state energy.

Contextual Notes

There are unresolved aspects regarding the assumptions made in the energy formulations, particularly concerning the implications of constants and the interpretation of negative energy states.

Moham1287
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
Hi all

I was just looking through my notes from my first year of my degree, and I couldn't find a missing bit. I know that Planck's postulate states that the allowed energies of a quantum simple harmonic oscillator are 0, hf, 2hf etc and that by the Schroedinger equation, you get E(n)=(n+1/2) hbar omega, but I can't explain why each of these give different answers. A quick google didn't bring up anything not password protected, and I don't have my textbooks with me at the moment. Anything to clear this up would be much appreciated!
Many thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Moham1287 said:
I know that Planck's postulate states that the allowed energies of a quantum simple harmonic oscillator are 0, hf, 2hf etc

Planck was dealing with electromagnetic radiation, not the simple harmonic oscillator (mass on a spring and similar things).
 
Moham1287 said:
...the allowed energies of a quantum simple harmonic oscillator are 0, hf, 2hf etc and that by the Schroedinger equation, you get E(n)=(n+1/2) hbar omega, but I can't explain why each of these give different answers...

\hbar\omega=hf

...the remaining difference is just a constant (0.5\hbar\omega) which can be ignored.
 
I.e., the Hamiltonians

<br /> H=\frac{p^2}{2m}+\frac{kx^2}{2}<br />

and

<br /> H&#039;=\frac{p^2}{2m}+\frac{kx^2}{2}-\hbar\sqrt{\frac{k}{4m}}<br />

describe the same physics since they differ only by a constant... and furthermore, it should be obvious that they are equal in the classical limit.
 
There's actually a little known paper by Einstein, where he first figures out that the Harmonic Oscillator needs a non-zero ground state energy, and he sticks in the 0.5 \hbar \omega by hand. Can't recall or pull up the citation. Anyone know what I'm talking about.
 
According to Schrödinger equation,the particle cannot have zero energy.Because the solutions are (v+1/2)hf,v is vibrational quantum number.If v happens to be -1,then energy is -ve,considering zero potential the KE is -ve and so is momentum.This is not in correspondance with uncertainity principle.
 
jtbell is correct also,I am sorry to misunderstand your question.Planck was dealing with the blackbody radiations and schrodnger with quantum mechanical harmonic oscillator.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K