What Are the Best Introductory Physics Resources for a High School Freshman?

  • Thread starter Thread starter A GUY
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Basics Physics
AI Thread Summary
To grasp the basics of physics, particularly for a high school freshman, a strong foundation in mathematics is essential, with an emphasis on algebra and calculus. Recommended resources include "Physics for Scientists and Engineers" by Tipler, though it may be advanced, and "How Things Work" by Louis Bloomfield for a conceptual understanding. It's advised to pair algebra-based physics books, such as Giancolli's "Physics: Principles with Applications," with more conceptual texts to enhance comprehension. Engaging with simulations, like those from the University of Colorado's Phet site, and conducting hands-on experiments can further solidify understanding. Mastery of high school mathematics, including algebra, index manipulations, logarithms, and graph analysis, is crucial before delving deeper into physics concepts.
A GUY
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Dear All,

I have you aware that I'm new here,and currently a high school freshman.

I'd actually like to learn some introductory materials needed to understand the basics of physics. Any recommendations? ~A GUY
 
Physics news on Phys.org


I'd focus on a lot of Newtonian mechanics as it sets the framework for the rest of physics to varying extents. Physics for Scientists and Engineers (Tipler) is very good but you may find advanced. As I'm in the UK I can't recommend many books as I don't know what's available in your country, but a great many books on mechanics have been written!

Perhaps just focus on what you learn at school?

Remember that the language of physics is mathematics, especially calculus, any work you can do on calculus will be highly beneficial and it's where I would start.
 


How much math and physics do you know already?

You must master algebra, and then calculus, to study physics seriously. To learn about the basics on a conceptual level, you might be able to do without calculus, but in any case algebra is a must.
 


I agree with the above by uman, In my last post I assumed you knew the basics of high school maths but yest you must certainly have a good mastery of :algebra,index manipulations,logarithms (v.related to index manipulations) and graph analysis, then move on to calculus. If these are not familiar to you your maths teacher at school will be able to help.
 


There are also some good non-mathematics physics books out there (more on the terms of "physical science / conceptual physics." At the college-level, I use "How Things Work" by Louis Bloomfield... and there's also "The Flying Circus of Physics" by Jearl Walker (Maybe it's just the edition I used back in the 90's, but I'm not so fond of Hewitt's "Conceptual Physics").

At this stage in your career, I'd suggest pairing one of these kind of books with an algebra-based book (maybe like Giancolli's "Physics: Principles with applications", even though I'm not 100% happy with it). Read back and forth between the two, so that you more fully understand the concepts with the math (try to balance these -- too often early students of physics think it's "just" another math course, while I think it's really more beautiful than that).

Furthermore, make use of some simulations (the University of Colorado "Phet" site has many simulations specifically designed to go with the Bloomfield text, which they also use), design your own experiments and make measurements (there's fun books out there on this kind of thing), and even try to build some stuff (motors, bridges, design mobiles etc.)
 
TL;DR Summary: I want to do a PhD in applied math but I hate group theory, is this a big problem? Hello, I am a second-year math and physics double major with a minor in data science. I just finished group theory (today actually), and it was my least favorite class in all of university so far. It doesn't interest me, and I am also very bad at it compared to other math courses I have done. The other courses I have done are calculus I-III, ODEs, Linear Algebra, and Prob/Stats. Is it a...
Yesterday, 9/5/2025, when I was surfing, I found an article The Schwarzschild solution contains three problems, which can be easily solved - Journal of King Saud University - Science ABUNDANCE ESTIMATION IN AN ARID ENVIRONMENT https://jksus.org/the-schwarzschild-solution-contains-three-problems-which-can-be-easily-solved/ that has the derivation of a line element as a corrected version of the Schwarzschild solution to Einstein’s field equation. This article's date received is 2022-11-15...
Back
Top