What are the Best Resources for Learning Contest-Type Mathematics?

  • Thread starter Thread starter ultimatebusta
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Contest Material
AI Thread Summary
For learning contest-type mathematics, "The Art and Craft of Problem Solving" by Paul Zeitz is highly recommended for its extensive problem sets and techniques. It effectively teaches problem-solving strategies applicable to various competitions, including geometry and number theory. "Problem-Solving Strategies" by Arthur Engel is suggested as a complementary resource for more advanced learners. Both books focus on fostering ingenuity rather than rote application of formulas, making them suitable for developing critical thinking skills. Engaging with these materials can significantly enhance preparation for upcoming contests.
ultimatebusta
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
I'm currently in IB SL Math (No HL here unfortunately), and I wish to learn more about contest-type mathematics as I have 3-4 contest here this year. Is there any books/materials that's useful for me?

I have taken a look at this book: https://www.amazon.com/dp/0817645276/?tag=pfamazon01-20 Though i found it a little difficult as the solutions to examples are quite vague, and there's no extra practise questions after each example. Also it doesn't have too much about trigonometry and geometry.

Any ideas would be greatly appreciated. I have a contest coming up in 2 weeks exactly, and a couple in 2011.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Yes, try looking for "Art and craft of problem solving" by Paul Zeitz. Me and people I know find this an incredibly good and useful book for learning contest problem solving. It does not only contain a large amount of good problems, but it also teaches common techniques from general principles to very specific tricks which can be very useful. You could complement with the slightly more advanced "Problem-solving strategies" by Arthur Engel later on, but both are in themselves very good books.
 
So in math class, we get a brief note, some examples, and some homework questions.

Anything like that in those 2 books/other materials?
 
ultimatebusta said:
So in math class, we get a brief note, some examples, and some homework questions.

Anything like that in those 2 books/other materials?

Not at all, I suggest you read some reviews of them on them. The problems in them are ranging in difficulty from the first round of high-school competitions to the IMO. None are like high-school exercises where you apply some basic technique/formula. All problems require some ingenuity, and the book teaches you how to effectively search for solutions to such problems. Both contains material on elementary geometry.
 
Last edited:
I agree that applying things like number theory requires extensive insight, but I do believe that i have to see a fair amount of those questions (where i solved/attempted to solve) in order to develop the skills to see through the trickeries of those questions and apply the skills
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top