What Are the Electric Field Components at a Charge Density Boundary?

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the electric field components at a charge density boundary, specifically addressing the boundary conditions for electrostatics. The total electric field components above and below the boundary are indeed the sum of the external field and the field due to the charge at the boundary. It is clarified that the electric field variables in the boundary condition equations represent the total electric field, not separate fields. The misconception that there are multiple electric fields is addressed, emphasizing that the equations of electromagnetism allow for superposition of contributions from various charges. The conclusion reinforces that any discontinuity in the electric field at the boundary arises from the surface charge.
Sebas4
Messages
13
Reaction score
2
Homework Statement
Boundary conditions electrostatics.
Relevant Equations
Meaning of the electric field variables in the boundary condition equations.
Hey, I have a really short question about electrostatics.
The boundary conditions are :
\mathbf{E}^{\perp }_{above} - \mathbf{E}^{\perp}_{below} = -\frac{\sigma}{\varepsilon_{0}}\mathbf{\hat{n}},
\mathbf{E}^{\parallel }_{above} = \mathbf{E}^{\parallel}_{below}.

My question is what is \mathbf{E}^{\perp }_{above}, \mathbf{E}^{\perp }_{below},
\mathbf{E}^{\parallel }_{above} and \mathbf{E}^{\parallel}_{below}, is it the total electric field component near the boundary?
So is the electric field in this equation the sum of the external field and the electric field due to the charge at the boundary?

I will try to explain my question with an example.
Let's say we have an infinite plane with homogeneous charge density \sigma.
The electric field above the plane
\mathbf{E} = \frac{\sigma}{2\varepsilon_{0}}\mathbf{\hat{z}}.
The electric field below the plane is
\mathbf{E} = - \frac{\sigma}{2\varepsilon_{0}}\mathbf{\hat{z}}.
We have a homogeneous external field pointing in the z-direction, \mathbf{E}_{external} = \mathbf{E}_{0} \mathbf{\hat{z}}.
The electric field just below the surface of the plane is
\mathbf{E}_{total below} = \left(\mathbf{E}_{0} - \frac{\sigma}{2\varepsilon_{0}}\right) \mathbf{\hat{z}}.
The electric field just above the surface of the plane is
\mathbf{E}_{total above} = \left(\mathbf{E}_{0} + \frac{\sigma}{2\varepsilon_{0}}\right) \mathbf{\hat{z}}.
If we plug this in, in the boundary condition we get
\mathbf{E}_{total above} - \mathbf{E}_{total below} = \left(\mathbf{E}_{0} + \frac{\sigma}{2\varepsilon_{0}}\right) \mathbf{\hat{z}} - \left(\mathbf{E}_{0} - \frac{\sigma}{2\varepsilon_{0}}\right) \mathbf{\hat{z}} = \frac{\sigma}{\varepsilon_{0}} \mathbf{\hat{z}}.
This is true, according to the boundary condition.

I have also another question, this also works for non-homogeneous charge density boundaries? (I think so).
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Sebas4 said:
Homework Statement:: Boundary conditions electrostatics.
Relevant Equations:: Meaning of the electric field variables in the boundary condition equations.

My question is what is Eabove⊥, Ebelow⊥,
Eabove∥ and Ebelow∥, is it the total electric field component near the boundary?
So is the electric field in this equation the sum of the external field and the electric field due to the charge at the boundary?
Yes. Total vector field
Notice the external field here does not really enter into the boundary condition because of the geometry. But the E field is always the total E field (or its components).
 
It is a common misconception that there are several electric fields. This most likely stems from the fact that the equations governing electromagnetism (Maxwell’s equations) are linear, which means that solutions to them can be superpositioned and it is therefore easy to colloquially say things like ”the electric field of charge A” when what would be more precise would be ”the contribution to the electric field from charge A” (which is more of a mouthfull). However, there is no way to independently measure such a contribution.

The above also means that the answer to your question is ”both”. Both the electric field and the contribution from the surface charge will exhibit this discontinuity because all other contributions will be continuous across the surface and so any discontinuity must arise from the surface charge.
 
  • Like
Likes Delta2, PhDeezNutz, vanhees71 and 1 other person
I want to find the solution to the integral ##\theta = \int_0^{\theta}\frac{du}{\sqrt{(c-u^2 +2u^3)}}## I can see that ##\frac{d^2u}{d\theta^2} = A +Bu+Cu^2## is a Weierstrass elliptic function, which can be generated from ##\Large(\normalsize\frac{du}{d\theta}\Large)\normalsize^2 = c-u^2 +2u^3## (A = 0, B=-1, C=3) So does this make my integral an elliptic integral? I haven't been able to find a table of integrals anywhere which contains an integral of this form so I'm a bit stuck. TerryW

Similar threads

Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
44
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
2K