What are the implications of supersymmetry for the Higgs boson and its mass?

deadscientist
Messages
29
Reaction score
0
Hello all,

How is it that super symmetry accounts for the Higgs having a mass and what would the 4 remaining Higgs bosons account for?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You don't need SUSY to account for the Higgs boson having a mass. The Standard Model does that just fine (the Higgs boson gets its mass by interacting with the Higgs field (roughly speaking) much the same as all the other particles with mass). SUSY can help explain why the mass is around the electroweak scale though. As for how, well it is a little technical and we'd have to start talking about the hierarchy problem.

As for what the extra SUSY Higgses "account for", well, nothing. They are just needed if you want SUSY to solve the aforementioned hierarchy problem.
 
deadscientist said:
Hello all,

How is it that super symmetry accounts for the Higgs having a mass and what would the 4 remaining Higgs bosons account for?

In the minimal supersymmetric Standard Model (MSSM), there is a conjectured potential for the Higgs fields that leads to a mass via a slightly more complicated version of the usual Higgs mechanism. The extra Higgs bosons are just extra scalar particles (that haven't been detected, of course), which include both neutral and electrically charged particles. The masses of these particles are parameter dependent.

Many details are discussed in http://arxiv.org/abs/hepph/9709356, but you would need a good QFT background to understand it completely.
 
I seem to notice a buildup of papers like this: Detecting single gravitons with quantum sensing. (OK, old one.) Toward graviton detection via photon-graviton quantum state conversion Is this akin to “we’re soon gonna put string theory to the test”, or are these legit? Mind, I’m not expecting anyone to read the papers and explain them to me, but if one of you educated people already have an opinion I’d like to hear it. If not please ignore me. EDIT: I strongly suspect it’s bunk but...
Back
Top