MHB What are the implications of x=0 in terms of function derivability?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Noismaker
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Function
AI Thread Summary
The discussion clarifies that "differentiability" is a more appropriate term than "derivability" when considering the implications of x=0 for the function f(x)=x^x. For positive x, the function is differentiable, as shown through logarithmic differentiation. The analysis for negative x also confirms differentiability by substituting y=-x and applying similar techniques. At x=0, the derivative involves evaluating a limit that determines whether f(x) is differentiable at that point. The conclusion is that x=0 represents a point of non-differentiation, indicating a cusp or vertical tangent.
Noismaker
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Attachments

  • snip_20170527101603.png
    snip_20170527101603.png
    1.4 KB · Views: 99
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I think "differentiability" would be a better word than "derivability" since that might be confused with the ability to "derive" a formula. In any case, the first thing I would do is remove the "absolute value" by looking at x positive or negative separately.

If x is positive, then f(x)= x^x and, taking the logarithm of both sides, log(f(x))= x log(x). Differentiating, f'(x)/f(x)= log(x)+ 1 so that f'(x)= (log(x)+ 1)f(x)= (log(x)+ 1)x^x. That exists for all positive x so f(x) is differentiable for all positive x.

If x is negative, make the substitution y= -x. |x|= -x= y so that x^x= y^{-y}. Again take the logarithm of both sides of f(y)= y^{-y}, log(f(y))= -ylog(y). Differentiating, f&#039;(y)/f(y)= -log(y)- 1 so that f&#039;(y)= -f(y)(log(y)+ 1)= -y^y(log(y)+ 1) and, since dy/dx= 0, f&amp;#039;(x)= (-x)^x(log(|x|)+ 1). That exists for all negative x so f(x) is differentiable for all negative x.<br /> <br /> Finally, look at x= 0. The derivative of f(x) at x= 0 is \lim_{h\to 0} \frac{f(h)- f(0)}{h}= \lim_{h\to 0}\frac{h^h- 1}{h}. Does that limit exist?
 

Attachments

  • snip_20170527203006.png
    snip_20170527203006.png
    735 bytes · Views: 100
  • snip_20170527203041.png
    snip_20170527203041.png
    602 bytes · Views: 92
  • snip_20170527203113.png
    snip_20170527203113.png
    584 bytes · Views: 85
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Back
Top