MHB What are the implications of x=0 in terms of function derivability?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Noismaker
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Function
AI Thread Summary
The discussion clarifies that "differentiability" is a more appropriate term than "derivability" when considering the implications of x=0 for the function f(x)=x^x. For positive x, the function is differentiable, as shown through logarithmic differentiation. The analysis for negative x also confirms differentiability by substituting y=-x and applying similar techniques. At x=0, the derivative involves evaluating a limit that determines whether f(x) is differentiable at that point. The conclusion is that x=0 represents a point of non-differentiation, indicating a cusp or vertical tangent.
Noismaker
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Attachments

  • snip_20170527101603.png
    snip_20170527101603.png
    1.4 KB · Views: 104
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I think "differentiability" would be a better word than "derivability" since that might be confused with the ability to "derive" a formula. In any case, the first thing I would do is remove the "absolute value" by looking at x positive or negative separately.

If x is positive, then f(x)= x^x and, taking the logarithm of both sides, log(f(x))= x log(x). Differentiating, f'(x)/f(x)= log(x)+ 1 so that f'(x)= (log(x)+ 1)f(x)= (log(x)+ 1)x^x. That exists for all positive x so f(x) is differentiable for all positive x.

If x is negative, make the substitution y= -x. |x|= -x= y so that x^x= y^{-y}. Again take the logarithm of both sides of f(y)= y^{-y}, log(f(y))= -ylog(y). Differentiating, f&#039;(y)/f(y)= -log(y)- 1 so that f&#039;(y)= -f(y)(log(y)+ 1)= -y^y(log(y)+ 1) and, since dy/dx= 0, f&amp;#039;(x)= (-x)^x(log(|x|)+ 1). That exists for all negative x so f(x) is differentiable for all negative x.<br /> <br /> Finally, look at x= 0. The derivative of f(x) at x= 0 is \lim_{h\to 0} \frac{f(h)- f(0)}{h}= \lim_{h\to 0}\frac{h^h- 1}{h}. Does that limit exist?
 

Attachments

  • snip_20170527203006.png
    snip_20170527203006.png
    735 bytes · Views: 105
  • snip_20170527203041.png
    snip_20170527203041.png
    602 bytes · Views: 95
  • snip_20170527203113.png
    snip_20170527203113.png
    584 bytes · Views: 91
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Back
Top