What are the latest developments and open problems in Ito calculus?

  • Thread starter Thread starter johnqwertyful
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Calculus
johnqwertyful
Messages
396
Reaction score
14
I've been learning Ito calculus and it seems so underdeveloped. What's new? What are the open problems? Who's working on it? What are the big developments? Anything?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
johnqwertyful said:
I've been learning Ito calculus and it seems so underdeveloped.
In what way? Please be specific.

What's new? What are the open problems? Who's working on it? What are the big developments? Anything?
It's the extension of regular calculus to stochastic processes.
But that should have been explained in the introductory materials you are using to learn from.
http://quantum.phys.cmu.edu/QIP/ito_calculus.pdf
 
Simon Bridge said:
In what way? Please be specific.

It's the extension of regular calculus to stochastic processes.
But that should have been explained in the introductory materials you are using to learn from.
http://quantum.phys.cmu.edu/QIP/ito_calculus.pdf

I learned what SDEs are, Feynman Kac, everything in introductory materials. What else is there? What's beyond SDEs, Ito's Lemma, Feynman Kac? What are the big open problems?
 
That's still a bit vague - but I think I see what you are getting at.
Have a look at: http://arxiv.org/pdf/math/0409277.pdf
.. p94 has a brief discussion of Wigner Gaussian matrices and points out that relaxing the "gaussian" requirement would be a tempting generalization. How to do this, would be an "open problem" for the field.

Each chapter has more examples.
That help?
 
Namaste & G'day Postulate: A strongly-knit team wins on average over a less knit one Fundamentals: - Two teams face off with 4 players each - A polo team consists of players that each have assigned to them a measure of their ability (called a "Handicap" - 10 is highest, -2 lowest) I attempted to measure close-knitness of a team in terms of standard deviation (SD) of handicaps of the players. Failure: It turns out that, more often than, a team with a higher SD wins. In my language, that...
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...

Similar threads

Back
Top