What Are the Limitations of Multiplying Delta Functions in Quantum Mechanics?

  • Thread starter Thread starter cjellison
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Distributions Text
cjellison
Messages
18
Reaction score
0
Hi, I am not seeking a "complete" treatment of distribution functions (like Gelfand or Schwartz). However, I would like some discussion in regards to multiplying delta functions together---especially in QM.

From the little I have discovered, distributions do not form an algebra, and thus, one cannot "legally" multiply delta functions together. However, we do this all the time:

<br /> \delta(\mathbf{r}-\mathbf{r}_0) = \delta(x-x_0)\delta(y-y_0)\delta(z-z_0)<br />

Also, I was wondering about a text that discussed in detail the problem with "complete" sets of eigenfunctions in an infinite-dimensional space (L_2) and normalizing to a delta function rather than to 1. I guess I am looking for better explanations than the typical "it just works" explanation. Do I need von Neumann's book?

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The theory of multiplying distributions is very much under-developed and is one of the reasons we lack a rigorous definition of Quantum Field Theory. There are several proposals but no full theory. One can define multiple algebras, the trick is one which preserves the properties you want.

For your second question have a look at https://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0502053
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
According to recent podcast between Jacob Barandes and Sean Carroll, Barandes claims that putting a sensitive qubit near one of the slits of a double slit interference experiment is sufficient to break the interference pattern. Here are his words from the official transcript: Is that true? Caveats I see: The qubit is a quantum object, so if the particle was in a superposition of up and down, the qubit can be in a superposition too. Measuring the qubit in an orthogonal direction might...
Back
Top