What Are the Limits of {xn} and {yn} in the Given Sequence?

huey910
Messages
34
Reaction score
0
Given x0 and y0 such that x0 > y0 > 0. Define, for n = 0,1,2,,
xn+1 =xn +yn , yn+1 = 2xnyn .Find the limits of {xn} and {yn}.

why is the answer lim{xn} = lim{yn} = sqrt(x0y0)?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
The problem as stated is wrong (e.g. x0 = 2, y0 =1. they just keep getting bigger).
 
Oh! Sorry, I transcribed the question erroneously. It should be:

Given x0 and y0 such that x0 > y0 > 0. Define, for n = 0,1,2,,
xn+1 =(xn +yn)/2 , yn+1 = 2xnyn/(xn + yn) .Find the limits of {xn} and {yn}.

why is the answer lim{xn} = lim{yn} = sqrt(x0y0)?
 
1) Show that x_n is decreasing, and y_n is increasing.
2) Show that x_n has a lower bound, and y_n has an upper bound.

Hint: Show that x_n < y_n by induction, and then that x_n+1 < x_n, and y_n+1 > y_n.

Do you know why they must converge in this case? It is a well known fact.

3) Find the limits by using the equations.
 
It is a well-known fact? Please expand on it and enlighten me! Thank you for the hints though!
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top