What are the physical applications of Lorenz and Coulomb gauge?

  • Thread starter Thread starter rida
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Gauge Lorenz
AI Thread Summary
The Lorenz and Coulomb gauges are used in electromagnetism to simplify the Maxwell equations, with the Lorenz gauge being suitable for time-dependent potentials and the Coulomb gauge for time-independent potentials. While both gauges lead to the same physical electromagnetic fields, the Lorenz gauge allows for the decoupling of equations, making it advantageous for analyzing radiation from charge and current distributions. The discussion emphasizes that gauge choices do not affect physical outcomes, as they are merely mathematical conveniences. The significance of these gauges lies in their ability to facilitate problem-solving in various applications, despite the lack of unique physical interpretations. Understanding their roles can enhance the analysis of electromagnetic phenomena in different contexts.
rida
Messages
13
Reaction score
0
i am searching the physical significance of lorenz and coloumb gauge but can't find anything besides that coloumb gauge is used for finding time independent potentials while lorenz is for finding time dependent potentials. and i'll be really grateful if u give me applications of then in any field.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi rida! Gauge freedom in the classical Maxwell field equations is not a physical degree of freedom in the sense that you are not doing anything physical by fixing a gauge; they are just choices of functions that allow you to put the field equations in some convenient form for the problem at hand while still yielding the same physical electromagnetic field.
 
WannabeNewton said:
Hi rida! Gauge freedom in the classical Maxwell field equations is not a physical degree of freedom in the sense that you are not doing anything physical by fixing a gauge; they are just choices of functions that allow you to put the field equations in some convenient form for the problem at hand while still yielding the same physical electromagnetic field.

but my teacher has asked for significance and applications, and from your point there won't be any of them.
moreover my teacher has told us that lorenz gauge can give us pure scalar and vector potentials. but coloumb gauge can not. is it true? and what is the logic behind it
 
I don't understand exactly the problem given by your teacher.

The electromagnetic field is given by \vec{E} and \vec{B}, and these are the physically fields which give the force acting on charges according to Lorentz's Law, and that's how they are operationally defined (in the limit of negligible test charges).

For the fully time-dependent electromagnetic field you need a scalar and a vector potential. These are introduced due to the homogeneous Maxwell equations, i.e.,
\frac{1}{c} \partial_t \vec{B}+\vec{\nabla} \times \vec{E}=0, \quad \vec{\nabla} \cdot \vec{B}=0.
From these equations you draw the conclusion that there are a scalar field \Phi and a vector field \vec{A} such that
\vec{E}=-\frac{1}{c} \partial_t \vec{A}-\vec{\nabla} \Phi, \quad \vec{B}=\vec{\nabla} \times \vec{A}.
For a given electromagnetic field (\vec{E},\vec{B}), the potentials are not uniquely defined since obviously if (\Phi,\vec{A}) are a set of potentials that give the em. field, also
\Phi'=\Phi+\frac{1}{c} \partial_{\chi}, \quad \vec{A}'=\vec{A} - \nabla \chi
give the same em. field for an arbitrary scalar field \chi. Thus you can give one scalar constraint to simplify your task to solve for \Phi and \vec{A} from the remaining inhomogeneous Maxwell equations,
\vec{\nabla} \cdot \vec{E}=\rho, \quad \vec{\nabla} \times \vec{B}-\frac{1}{c} \partial_t \vec{E}=\vec{j}.
The first inhomogeneous equation (Gauß's Law), written in terms of the potential reads
-\left (\frac{1}{c} \partial_t \vec{\nabla} \cdot \vec{A} + \Delta \Phi \right )=\rho.
If you choose the Lorenz-gauge condition
\frac{1}{c} \partial_t \Phi+\vec{\nabla} \cdot \vec{A}=0,
then you have
\left (\frac{1}{c^2} \partial_t^2 - \Delta \right ) \Phi:=\Box \Phi=\rho.
For the Ampere-Maxwell Law you get in terms of the potentials
\vec{\nabla} \times (\vec{\nabla} \times \vec{A}) + \frac{1}{c} \left (\frac{1}{c} \partial_t^2 \vec{A}+\nabla \partial_t \Phi \right)=\vec{j}.
If you use the Lorenz-gauge condition again in
\vec{\nabla} \times (\vec{\nabla} \times \vec{A})=\vec{\nabla} (\vec{\nabla} \cdot \vec{A})-\Delta \vec{A}=-\frac{1}{c} \nabla \partial_t \Phi - \Delta \vec{A},
you get
\Box \vec{A}=\vec{j}.
As you see, the Lorenz gauge has the advantage that the equations for the scalar potential and the three components of the vector field decouple to four wave equations, and that's why this is a convenient gauge to describe the radiation from given charge and current distributions.

You can of course use any other gauge to solve for the inhomogeneous equations. For some tasks other gauges can be more convenient. The physical outcome, i.e., the em. field is of course always the same, independent of the gauge condition chosen.
 
Hello! Let's say I have a cavity resonant at 10 GHz with a Q factor of 1000. Given the Lorentzian shape of the cavity, I can also drive the cavity at, say 100 MHz. Of course the response will be very very weak, but non-zero given that the Loretzian shape never really reaches zero. I am trying to understand how are the magnetic and electric field distributions of the field at 100 MHz relative to the ones at 10 GHz? In particular, if inside the cavity I have some structure, such as 2 plates...
Back
Top