Medical What are the risks of Zika virus during pregnancy?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Ygggdrasil
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Virus
AI Thread Summary
The CDC has confirmed a causal relationship between the Zika virus and microcephaly, following extensive research that met established criteria for determining teratogenic effects. This marks a significant development in understanding the risks associated with Zika virus infection during pregnancy. The New England Journal of Medicine supports this conclusion, citing evidence such as the presence of the virus in the brain tissue of affected infants and the timing of infections correlating with observed birth defects. The CDC emphasizes the need for increased prevention efforts while acknowledging that many questions remain regarding the full spectrum of defects and risk factors associated with Zika virus exposure. Additionally, discussions highlight that Zika can also be sexually transmitted, raising concerns about its potential impact during conception. The conversation suggests that sexual transmission could theoretically lead to direct infection of the egg, although this remains speculative.
Ygggdrasil
Science Advisor
Insights Author
Gold Member
Messages
3,753
Reaction score
4,198
The CDC has released a statement confirming that Zika virus, a mosquito-borne pathogen currently spreading throughout the Americas, causes microcephaly and other birth defects in children born to mothers who contract the virus during pregnancy:
"This study marks a turning point in the Zika outbreak. It is now clear that the virus causes microcephaly," CDC director, Dr. Tom Frieden said.

Previously, the agency said it's likely the virus in pregnant women was the cause of the rare birth defect that results in an underdeveloped brain and that the evidence was mounting. However, they maintained that more research was needed before they could conclusively say it is causal.

There was no smoking gun that lead to this proclamation, according to a special report detailing the evidence published online by the New England Journal of Medicine Wednesday.

Based on all of the available evidence, the CDC said two separate sets of criteria to determine a pathogen or environmental exposure causes a birth defect have been met.
http://www.cnn.com/2016/04/13/health/cdc-zika-virus-microcephaly/

Here's the summary of the NEJM article cited:
The Zika virus has spread rapidly in the Americas since its first identification in Brazil in early 2015. Prenatal Zika virus infection has been linked to adverse pregnancy and birth outcomes, most notably microcephaly and other serious brain anomalies. To determine whether Zika virus infection during pregnancy causes these adverse outcomes, we evaluated available data using criteria that have been proposed for the assessment of potential teratogens. On the basis of this review, we conclude that a causal relationship exists between prenatal Zika virus infection and microcephaly and other serious brain anomalies. Evidence that was used to support this causal relationship included Zika virus infection at times during prenatal development that were consistent with the defects observed; a specific, rare phenotype involving microcephaly and associated brain anomalies in fetuses or infants with presumed or confirmed congenital Zika virus infection; and data that strongly support biologic plausibility, including the identification of Zika virus in the brain tissue of affected fetuses and infants. Given the recognition of this causal relationship, we need to intensify our efforts toward the prevention of adverse outcomes caused by congenital Zika virus infection. However, many questions that are critical to our prevention efforts remain, including the spectrum of defects caused by prenatal Zika virus infection, the degree of relative and absolute risks of adverse outcomes among fetuses whose mothers were infected at different times during pregnancy, and factors that might affect a woman’s risk of adverse pregnancy or birth outcomes. Addressing these questions will improve our ability to reduce the burden of the effects of Zika virus infection during pregnancy.
http://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMsr1604338
 
  • Like
Likes Pepper Mint, Fervent Freyja and Greg Bernhardt
Biology news on Phys.org
waternohitter said:
It can be sexually transmitted between gay men as well.

Yeah good point all sexual contact can resultant in exposer. But heterosexual transmission could be a way of transmitting the virus through fertilization directly into the ovum. I can see how that could cause the chromosome damage at the onset of pregnancy.

The virus could adhere to the zygote directly during cell division and development causing the egg itself to become infected.
 
Last edited:
@gjonesy - do you have a link for that? Sounds interesting.
 
jim mcnamara said:
do you have a link for that? Sounds interesting

I'll try to find the article, I think its mostly speculative at this early stage. Zika being linked directly to microcephaly. It would stand to reason that the transmission of the virus sexually during conception would be the optimal way to transmit the disease to the unborn child.

https://www.statnews.com/2016/02/26/sexual-transmission-zika/http://www.cdc.gov/zika/pregnancy/index.html

http://www.cdc.gov/zika/pregnancy/index.htmlThis is the best article: its still speculative its known that its transmitted across the placenta, what's not known is if fetal infection can occur first transmitting it straight to the egg. But the article leaves room for that inference.

http://www.cbsnews.com/news/zika-virus-and-pregnancy-what-women-need-to-know/
 
Deadly cattle screwworm parasite found in US patient. What to know. https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/health/2025/08/25/new-world-screwworm-human-case/85813010007/ Exclusive: U.S. confirms nation's first travel-associated human screwworm case connected to Central American outbreak https://www.reuters.com/business/environment/us-confirms-nations-first-travel-associated-human-screwworm-case-connected-2025-08-25/...
Chagas disease, long considered only a threat abroad, is established in California and the Southern U.S. According to articles in the Los Angeles Times, "Chagas disease, long considered only a threat abroad, is established in California and the Southern U.S.", and "Kissing bugs bring deadly disease to California". LA Times requires a subscription. Related article -...
I am reading Nicholas Wade's book A Troublesome Inheritance. Please let's not make this thread a critique about the merits or demerits of the book. This thread is my attempt to understanding the evidence that Natural Selection in the human genome was recent and regional. On Page 103 of A Troublesome Inheritance, Wade writes the following: "The regional nature of selection was first made evident in a genomewide scan undertaken by Jonathan Pritchard, a population geneticist at the...

Similar threads

Replies
62
Views
9K
Replies
21
Views
3K
Replies
11
Views
27K
Back
Top