What are the Solutions to a Complex Quadratic Equation?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around solving the complex quadratic equation z^2 - (7+2i)z + (12+8i) = 0. The user initially attempts to find the square root of a complex number but struggles with determining the correct argument for the complex plane. It is clarified that when using arctan, adjustments must be made based on the quadrant in which the complex number lies, specifically that adding π is necessary for angles in the third quadrant. The conversation also emphasizes the importance of recognizing that there are two square roots for complex numbers, which can be derived using De'Moivre's theorem. Ultimately, the user finds a solution and acknowledges the existence of both roots.
naaa00
Messages
90
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Hello!

z^2 - (7+2i)z + (12+8i) = 0

The Attempt at a Solution



I used the quadratic equation and got:

z = (7+2i)/2 +- sqrt( -3/4 - i)

r = 5/4, and the argument is Theta = arctan(-1/-3/4) = 0.927 925 - Pi (since x < 0 and y < 0, right?)

Then, I know that z = e^theta*i, or z =r * (cos(theta) + i sin(theta)). Hence

sqrt(z) = sqrt(r)sqrt(cos(theta) + i sin(theta))

...

But then, I'm stucked...

Any suggestion will be very appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Do you know De'Moivre's formula? One of its applications is finding the nth root of a complex number.
 
sqrt(z) = sqrt(r){cos[(theta + 2Pi)/2] + i sin[(theta+ 2Pi)/2]}

and got : -0.894 - 0.447i

But this answer is wrong.

Apparently in the argument Theta = arctan(-1/-3/4) = 0.927 925 - Pi

I should be adding Pi, instead of substracting it, but I don't understand why. I read that if x < 0 and y < 0, I should substract Pi...

that answer should be -0.5 + i

...
 
naaa00 said:
I read that if x < 0 and y < 0, I should substract Pi...
I think here is the confusion. If you are trying to find a trig function of a 3rd quadrant angle, you subtract π to find its reference angle. This isn't the same thing. When you take an arctan, you get an angle between -π/2 and π/2 (but not including -π/2 or π/2), so depending on where the point is on the complex plane, you may need to add π (or 2π, if the point is in the 4th quadrant you wish your angle to be in 0 ≤ θ < 2π).
 
Ok. Let's see if I understand it now:

Arctan gave me this angle: 0.927 925, which is on the first quadrant. But the point on the complex plane is on the third quadrant. So I would have to add pi, so that the angle reaches the third quadrant?

"or 2π, if the point is in the 4th quadrant you wish your angle to be in 0 ≤ θ < 2π"

But arctan includes the IV quadrant, right? -Pi/2 is not -270 degrees?
 
i'm affraid that I'm still having the incorrect answer:

From

sqrt(z) = sqrt(r){cos[(theta + 2Pi)/2] + i sin[(theta+ 2Pi)/2]}

And using the new value of arctan, 4.0688...

I have the feeling that the mistake is somewhere over here:

sqrt(z) = sqrt(r){cos[(theta + 2Pi)/2] + i sin[(theta+ 2Pi)/2]}

But I can't tell...
 
one thing that might help you is this:

we are trying to find the square root of this complex number:

z = -3/4 - i.

now, z = r(cosθ + i sinθ).

you correctly calculated r as 5/4.

but finding "θ" is bogging you down.

all you need to know is that:

-3/4 - i = 5/4((-3/5) + i(-4/5))

this tells us cosθ = -3/5, sinθ = -4/5.

now de moivre's formula let's us calculate one square root of z as:

√z = √r(cos(θ/2) + i sin(θ/2)).

we don't need to find θ, then divide θ by 2, and then take the cosine and sine. knowing cosθ alone is good enough, because:

cos(θ/2) = ±√[(1+cosθ)/2]

and we can use the quadrants to tell us which sign to take. since θ is in the 3rd quadrant, θ/2 is in the second quadrant, so we want the negative square root.

similarly, sin(θ/2) = ±√[(1-cosθ)/2].

so, have fun :)
 
naaa00 said:
sqrt(z) = sqrt(r){cos[(theta + 2Pi)/2] + i sin[(theta+ 2Pi)/2]}
Technically, it should be
\sqrt{z} = \sqrt{r}\left( \cos \left( \frac{\theta + 2k\pi}{2} \right) + i\sin \left( \frac{\theta + 2k\pi}{2} \right) \right),
with k = 0 and 1.
So for k = 0:
\sqrt{z} \approx \sqrt{5/4}\left( \cos \left( \frac{4.0689}{2} \right) + i\sin \left( \frac{4.0689i}{2} \right) \right),

Check to make sure that you had multiplied by the square root of 5/4 at the end. I'm not sure you did.
 
well, I must confess I'm terrible with the calculator. Now it works.

I also tried Deveno's method and it worked also. The only thing I actually don't grasp 100 percent is the following sentence "since θ is in the 3rd quadrant, θ/2 is in the second quadrant, so we want the negative square root." I know θ is on the III quadrant, but why θ/2 is in the second? As you can see my trignometry knowledge is very weak. I could say I didn't learned trigonometry, until very recently...

But I liked Deveno's method! However, I found there is even a faster and easier method!

sqrt(-3/4 - i) = a + ib

=> -3/4 - i = a^2 - b^2 + 2abi

The real part and imaginary, then, must be

-3/4 = a^2 - b^2

-i = 2abi

=> b = 1 and a = -1/2

=> -1/2 + i.
 
  • #10
naaa00 said:
well, I must confess I'm terrible with the calculator. Now it works.

I also tried Deveno's method and it worked also. The only thing I actually don't grasp 100 percent is the following sentence "since θ is in the 3rd quadrant, θ/2 is in the second quadrant, so we want the negative square root." I know θ is on the III quadrant, but why θ/2 is in the second? As you can see my trignometry knowledge is very weak. I could say I didn't learned trigonometry, until very recently...
If θ is in the 3rd quadrant, then π ≤ θ ≤ 3π/2. This means that π/2 ≤ θ/2 ≤ 3π/4, which means that θ/2 is in the 2nd quadrant.

naaa00 said:
-3/4 = a^2 - b^2

-i = 2abi

=> b = 1 and a = -1/2

=> -1/2 + i.
Shouldn't there be another answer? You're looking for two square roots.
 
  • #11
eumyang said:
If θ is in the 3rd quadrant, then π ≤ θ ≤ 3π/2. This means that π/2 ≤ θ/2 ≤ 3π/4, which means that θ/2 is in the 2nd quadrant.


Shouldn't there be another answer? You're looking for two square roots.

well, yes.

the other square root should be "halfway-'round" the same circle the square root we found was on. that is, the same magnitude, but in the opposite direction.

if we call the square root we found w, then it's clear that the other one we are looking for, is -w.

however, since the quadratic formula has a +/- in it, it takes care of this for us:

{±w} = {±(-w)}.
 
  • #12
eumyang said:
Shouldn't there be another answer? You're looking for two square roots.
Deveno said:
well, yes.

the other square root should be "halfway-'round" the same circle the square root we found was on. that is, the same magnitude, but in the opposite direction.

if we call the square root we found w, then it's clear that the other one we are looking for, is -w.

however, since the quadratic formula has a +/- in it, it takes care of this for us:

{±w} = {±(-w)}.
I was asking the OP, actually. I wanted to make sure he/she knew that ultimately there were two solutions for z.
 
  • #13
eumyang said:
I was asking the OP, actually. I wanted to make sure he/she knew that ultimately there were two solutions for z.

interestingly enough, one of the roots is real.
 
Back
Top