What are the top undergraduate textbook in Classical Mechanics?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around recommendations for undergraduate textbooks in Classical Mechanics, exploring various texts and their perceived strengths and weaknesses. Participants share personal experiences with different books and inquire about errors in specific texts.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation
  • Exploratory

Main Points Raised

  • One participant mentions errors in Douglas Gregory's "Classical Mechanics," particularly in Chapter 6, and seeks alternative recommendations.
  • Another participant suggests several texts for different levels, including Feynman for introductory, Kleppner & Kolenkow for Newtonian mechanics, and Goldstein for analytical mechanics, noting that the second edition is preferable.
  • A third participant advocates for Igor Irodov's "Fundamental Laws of Mechanics," claiming it is a recommended text in many universities.
  • Some participants express interest in compiling errata for Gregory's book, with one providing a link to a resource for errors.
  • Another participant critiques Gregory's book, suggesting that if it contains many errors, it may be better to choose a different author.
  • Two participants recommend Scheck's lectures and Kuypers' book, although there is uncertainty about the availability of English translations.
  • A participant shares their teacher's preference for Goldstein and Landau, favoring Goldstein for its comprehensive content.
  • One participant lists additional undergraduate and graduate-level texts not previously mentioned, including Marion, Becker, Baierlein, and Moore, sharing their personal experiences with these books and the challenges faced due to instructor quality.
  • Another participant notes that Schaum's outline is useful for problem-solving, despite being light on theory.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a variety of opinions on the best textbooks, with no clear consensus on a single recommended text. Multiple competing views on the quality and reliability of different books remain evident.

Contextual Notes

Some discussions reference specific chapters and editions, highlighting the importance of context in evaluating the texts. There are mentions of personal experiences with instructors that may influence the perception of the textbooks.

shinobi20
Messages
277
Reaction score
20
I currently have Classical Mechanics by Douglas Gregory. I found that there are a lot of errors in his text mostly in Chapter 6 (Energy Conservation). Before I read some parts of Classical Mechanics by John Taylor but felt that he is too verbose that is why I have tried to scan other text. Any more recommendations?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Introductory freshman level : Feynman, AP French

Newtonian Mechanics : Kleppner & Kolenkow

Analytical Mechanics : Goldstein (2nd edition is better)

Nice Problem Book : David Morin text, YK Lim, Sidney B Cahn
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I want to know if anyone knows some errata or compiled errors in the book of Gregory?
 
I've never even heard of that book. If it's full of errors like you said, then probably, you'd better use another book, written by an author who cares enough to not Publish things ridden with errors.
 
I think two of the best books is the one by Scheck (vol. 1 of his lectures on theoretical physics) and the one by Kuypers. I'm pretty sure there exists an English translation of Scheck's, but not whether there's one for Kuypers's.
 
My teacher only recommends two: Goldstein and Landau, but I prefer Goldstein's. It has everything you need to know and much more, and it's worth it if you have the patience and time to read the text. Or else just scroll to the important parts.
 
Looking at my bookshelf, I am seeing a number of books that have not been mentioned.

Undergraduate level:
Marion, now Marion and Thorndike
Becker (old, but very insightful)
Baierlein
Barger and Olson

Graduate:
Moore

Now, I will say, that during my school career, I used Marion for under grad and Moore for graduate, neither instructor was very good, so I had to fill in the gaps and learn it using other books. When I went back for my PhD, I used Goldstein, still didn't have a really good instructor, so really had to fill in the gaps. I will say that the Schaum's outline is pretty good, light on theory but heavy on good problems.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 39 ·
2
Replies
39
Views
10K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
8K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
7K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
7K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
5K