What are the units for Young's Modulus in GPa?

AI Thread Summary
Young's Modulus is expressed in gigapascals (GPa), which is a unit of pressure equivalent to 10^9 pascals. Stress is measured in kilonewtons per square meter (kN/m²), which is also equivalent to kilopascals (kPa). Since strain is dimensionless, Young's Modulus can indeed be calculated as stress divided by strain, resulting in units of kN/m² or GPa. Therefore, the confusion arises from the conversion between these units, where 1 GPa equals 1,000,000 kPa. Understanding these conversions clarifies the use of GPa in product specifications for materials.
robsmith82
Messages
17
Reaction score
0
I seem to be going a bit brain dead here, but in youngs modulus, how are the units in GPa as they are in one of my product specs I've just received?

Lets say we have stress in kN/m^2 and strain has no units, then surely E should be in kN/m^2?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Pressure is measured in Pascals, and Pressure is defined as a force per unit area. So, a Pascal is really one Newton per unit area: N/m^2, for instance. So, kN/m^2 = kPa, which of course is just 10^6 GPa.
 
Doh.

Thanks!
 
Thread 'Gauss' law seems to imply instantaneous electric field propagation'
Imagine a charged sphere at the origin connected through an open switch to a vertical grounded wire. We wish to find an expression for the horizontal component of the electric field at a distance ##\mathbf{r}## from the sphere as it discharges. By using the Lorenz gauge condition: $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A} + \frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial t}=0\tag{1}$$ we find the following retarded solutions to the Maxwell equations If we assume that...
Maxwell’s equations imply the following wave equation for the electric field $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}}{\partial t^2} = \frac{1}{\varepsilon_0}\nabla\rho+\mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf J}{\partial t}.\tag{1}$$ I wonder if eqn.##(1)## can be split into the following transverse part $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}_T-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}_T}{\partial t^2} = \mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf{J}_T}{\partial t}\tag{2}$$ and longitudinal part...
Thread 'Recovering Hamilton's Equations from Poisson brackets'
The issue : Let me start by copying and pasting the relevant passage from the text, thanks to modern day methods of computing. The trouble is, in equation (4.79), it completely ignores the partial derivative of ##q_i## with respect to time, i.e. it puts ##\partial q_i/\partial t=0##. But ##q_i## is a dynamical variable of ##t##, or ##q_i(t)##. In the derivation of Hamilton's equations from the Hamiltonian, viz. ##H = p_i \dot q_i-L##, nowhere did we assume that ##\partial q_i/\partial...
Back
Top